Cited by 9Cancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersImmunotherapy and Immune ResponsesImmunotoxicology and immune responses

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Interleukin-6 is potential target to de-couple checkpoint inhibitor-induced colitis from antitumor immunity.

Abstract

2616 Background: A deep understanding of the immunobiology of checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) induced immune related toxicities, such as immune related enterocolitis (irEC), and how these compare to the immune signatures in tumors could lead to the development of strategies that de-couple autoimmunity from anti-tumor immunity. Methods: Total RNA from patient-matched irEC and normal colon FFPE tissue from patients [n = 12] receiving CPIs were profiled with the 770 gene NanoString nCounter PanCancer Immune Profiling Panel (NanoPCIP). The mean fold change in gene expression from normal vs. irEC inflamed colonic tissue and baseline vs. on-treatment tumor samples from patients responding or non-responding to ipilimumab based therapy were analyzed. C57BL/6 mice with B16.BL6 melanoma tumors were treated with systemic anti-IL-6 + anti-CTLA-4 vs. anti-CTLA4 alone vs. placebo and tumor size was measured. Results: In patients with irEC, the highest significantly upregulated differentially expressed gene (DEG) in inflamed colon tissue encoded for IL-6 (Fold change +24.1). None of the significant and highest upregulated DEGs in the colitis, including IL-6, were significantly upregulated in responding tumors. Interestingly, IL-6 was also the highest upregulated DEG in non-responding tumors numerically. When comparing mean fold changes across these analyses, the gene with the largest difference in upregulatation between colitis and responding tumors was IL-6; the other highest upregulated genes in colitis encoded for neutrophil and monocyte chemotactic molecules. In our mouse models, the addition of IL-6 blockade to anti-CTLA-4 therapy significantly improved tumor shrinkage compared to anti-CTLA-4 alone. Conclusions: Our data demonstrates that IL-6-mediated inflammation may be more prevalent in irEC and tumors not responding to CPIs than in tumors responding, and blocking IL-6 enhances CPI anti-melanoma activity. Targeting IL-6 may ameliorate irEC without hindering anti-tumor immunity.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.2616

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Johnson, D. H., Hailemichael, Y., Foo, W. C., Hess, K. R., Haymaker, C. L., Wani, K. M., Lazar, A. J., Saberian, C. M., Bentebibel, S. E., Burton, E. M., Abu-Sbeih, H., Wang, Y., Hwu, P., & Diab, A.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX;
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2019-05-20
Volume
37
Issue
15_suppl
Pages
2616-2616
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2947957895
Cited by
9
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotoxicology and immune responses
Keywords
interleukin-6, immune checkpoint inhibitors, CTLA-4 blockade, ipilimumab, IL-6 inhibition, antitumor immunity, melanoma, chemokines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review