Cited by 15Cancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersImmune Cell Function and InteractionImmunotherapy and Immune Responses

COM701 with or without nivolumab: Results of an ongoing phase 1 study of safety, tolerability and preliminary antitumor activity in patients with advanced solid malignancies (NCT03667716).

Vaena, Daniel A., Fleming, Gini F., Chmielowski, Bartosz, Sharma, Manish, Hamilton, Erika P., Sullivan, Ryan J., Shepard, Dale Randall, Papadopoulos, Kyriakos P. +7 more·2021·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

2504 Background: COM701 is a novel first in class humanized IgG4 monoclonal antibody that binds with high affinity to poliovirus receptor related immunoglobulin domain containing (PVRIG), blocking its interaction with its ligand, PVRL2. Blocking of PVRIG leads to enhanced activation of T/NK cells and in mouse models inhibits tumor growth. We report new and updated results on safety/tolerability/pharmacokinetics and antitumor activity from this ongoing study including final results in dose escalation combination cohort, monotherapy expansion cohort (MEC). Methods: We enrolled a total of 51 DLT-evaluable pts: Arm A (COM701 mono dose escalation), 16 pts in 8 cohorts (0.01 – 20 mg/kg IV Q3/4 wks); Arm B (COM701 0.3 – 20 mg/kg + nivolumab (NIVO) 360 mg/480 mg IV Q3/Q4 wks), 15 pts in 5 cohorts; 20 pts in MEC (NSCLC, OVCA, breast, endometrial and CRC) at the recommended dose for expansion(RDFE), 20 mg/kg IV Q4 wks. Key inclusion criteria: Age ≥18 yrs, histologically confirmed metastatic solid malignancy, has exhausted available standard tx, ECOG 0-1, prior ICI permissible (except prior tx with a PVRIG inhibitor). Key exclusion criteria: active autoimmune disease requiring systemic tx, hx inflammatory lung disease. Primary objectives – safety/tolerability of COM701 ± NIVO (AEs, CTCAE v4.03), PK, RDFE. Key secondary/exploratory objectives - antitumor activity of COM701 ± NIVO (RECIST v1.1), evaluation of PVRL2 expression in tumor biopsy, blood cytokines and immunophenotyping. Results: No DLTs were reported in Arms A or B. COM701 PK profile similar in Arm A, 20 mg/kg IV Q4 wks (cohort 8) and Arm B cohort 5 (COM701 20 mg/kg + NIVO 480 mg; all IV Q4 wks). Frequency of TEAEs in safety population (N=54 pts): pts on COM701 mono (N=38)- No AE (4), Grade≤2 (21), G3 (11), G4 (1), G5 (1, PD), pts on combo (N=16) - Grade≤2 (8), G3 (7), G5 (1, PD). Serious TEAE: pts on COM701 mono 11/38, pts on combo 6/16. Most frequent AEs in Arm A: Grade ≤2 fatigue 12/38 pts (31%), nausea 9/38 (23%); Arm B: fatigue 7/16 pts (44%) and AST increased 4/16 pts (25%). Antitumor activity - in Arm A (cohort 8), a pt with platinum resistant primary peritoneal cancer had confirmed PR ongoing 14 months. In Arm B (COM701 10 mg/kg + NIVO 480 mg, all IV Q4 wks), a pt with anal SCCA; confirmed CR, ongoing 18 months, last tx with prior PD on NIVO. In addition, a pt with renal cell CA had confirmed SD [ongoing 13 months, COM701 0.3 mg/kg + NIVO 360mg; IV Q3 wks],] In MEC, 30% (6/20 pts) had best response of SD [1-endometrial, 3 NSCLC, 2 OVCA], 2 pts [NSCLC, OVCA] ongoing at 6/4 months. Overall 16pts had prior tx-refractory disease, 9(56%) had best response of ≥SD. Of 18 pts with prior tx with ICI, 13 (72%) had best response of ≥SD. Datacut 14Dec2020. Conclusions: COM701 ± NIVO well tolerated with no new safety signals. Encouraging signal of antitumor activity including in pts with prior tx with ICI or prior tx-refractory disease. Clinical trial information: NCT03667716..

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.2504

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the phase 1 study NCT03667716, COM701 (α-PVRIG) plus nivolumab exhibited encouraging antitumor activity even in some patients with prior ICI treatment.

    “Moreover, in the phase 1 study NCT03667716, COM701 (α-PVRIG) plus nivolumab exhibited encouraging antitumor activity even in some patients with prior ICI treatment [166].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vaena, D. A., Fleming, G. F., Chmielowski, B., Sharma, M., Hamilton, E. P., Sullivan, R. J., Shepard, D. R., Papadopoulos, K. P., Patnaik, A., ElNaggar, A., Adewoye, A. H., Smith, R., Lim, E. A., Dumbrava, E. E., & Rasco, D. W.
Affiliations
  • West Cancer Center and Research Institute., Memphis, TN;
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • START-Midwest, Grand Rapids, MI;
  • Tennessee Oncology (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • Cleveland Clinic (US)
  • South Texas Accelerated Research Therapeutics (US)
  • West Cancer Center (US)
  • Compugen USA Inc., South San Francisco, CA;
  • Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2021-05-20
Volume
39
Issue
15_suppl
Pages
2504-2504
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W3170708911
Cited by
14
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
Funders
Compugen Ltd
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune Cell Function and Interaction
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
Keywords
PVRIG, PVRL2, nivolumab, immune checkpoint inhibitor combination, advanced solid tumors, dose escalation, safety and tolerability, pharmacokinetics, anticancer activity, T cell activation, natural killer cells, anti-PD-1 therapy, immune-related adverse events, PD-L1 expression, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review