Cited by 76Gastric Cancer Management and OutcomesFibroblast Growth Factor ResearchLung Cancer Treatments and Mutations

Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled phase 2 study of bemarituzumab combined with modified FOLFOX6 (mFOLFOX6) in first-line (1L) treatment of advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (FIGHT)

Wainberg, Zev A., Enzinger, Peter C., Kang, Yoon-Koo, Yamaguchi, Kensei, Qin, Shukui, Lee, Keun-Wook, Oh, Sang Cheul, Li, Jin +8 more·2021·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

160 Background: Bemarituzumab (bema), a first-in-class humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody, selectively binds to FGFR2b, inhibits ligand binding and mediates antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity. A phase 1 study of bema monotherapy in solid tumors had no dose-limiting toxicities and a confirmed objective response rate (ORR) of 18% in patients (pts) with refractory FGFR2b+ gastric cancer (GC). Methods: The FIGHT study (NCT03343301) is a global, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial. Pts with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic GC that was not HER2+ were eligible if their tumor was positive for FGFR2b overexpression by centrally performed immunohistochemistry (IHC) or for FGFR2 amplification by circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). Pts were treated with mFOLFOX6 and randomized 1:1 to bema 15mg/kg or placebo (pbo) every 2 weeks with 1 additional 7.5mg/kg bema/pbo dose on day 8. Treatment was continued until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or death. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) and key secondary endpoints include overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), and frequency of adverse events. Statistical significance (2-sided a of 0.2) was tested sequentially for PFS, OS and ORR. Results: Of 910 1L GC pts whose tumors were evaluated 275 (30%) were FGFR2b+. Of 155 pts randomized, 77 to bema+mFOLFOX6 and 78 to pbo+mFOLFOX6, 149 were FGFR2b+ by IHC and 26 by ctDNA. The primary endpoint was met with an improvement in median PFS of 9.5 mo (bema) vs 7.4 mo (pbo) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44-1.04; p=0.07). The secondary endpoint of OS was met; median not reached in the bema arm vs 12.9 mo for pbo (HR, 0.58, 95% CI, 0.35-0.95; p=0.03). Among patients with measurable disease, ORR improved from 40% (pbo) to 53% (bema). Improved efficacy was observed across all 3 endpoints (PFS, OS, ORR) with increasing levels of overexpression of FGFR2b on tumor cells. Grade ≥3 AEs were reported in 83% of pts in the bema arm vs 74% pts in the pbo arm with serious AEs in 32% and 36% respectively. Stomatitis was higher in the bema arm (31.6% vs 13.0%) and corneal AEs were more common in the bema arm (67% vs 10%). There were no reported AEs of retinal detachment or hyperphosphatemia in the bema arm. Conclusion: Approximately 30% of 1L pts with advanced GC not HER2+, were identified to be FGFR2b+, primarily by IHC. In this randomized, placebo controlled, double-blind phase 2 study, the addition of bema to mFOLFOX6 led to clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvements in PFS, OS and ORR. An increase in corneal AEs and stomatitis was associated with bema. These results support a prospective randomized phase 3 study in GC and the evaluation of bema in other FGFR2b+ tumor types. Clinical trial information: NCT03694522.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2021.39.3_suppl.160

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ERBB2 and FGFR2 amplifications in stomach cancer are actionable alterations for precision medicine.

    “Importantly, KRAS, ERBB2, and FGFR2 amplifications are mutually exclusive in stomach cancer (91), with the latter two types of amplification subtypes already representing actionable alterations for precision medicine approaches (92, 93).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wainberg, Z. A., Enzinger, P. C., Kang, Y.-K., Yamaguchi, K., Qin, S., Lee, K.-W., Oh, S. C., Li, J., Turk, H. M., Teixeira, A. C., Cardellino, G. G., Guardeño, R., Mitra, S., Yang, Y., Collins, H., & Catenacci, D. V. T.
Affiliations
  • Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center (US)
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
  • Asan Medical Center (KR)
  • The Cancer Institute Hospital (JP)
  • Nanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Command (CN)
  • Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (KR)
  • Korea University Guro Hospital (KR)
  • Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University (CN)
  • Bezmialem Vakif University Medical Faculty, Department of Medical Oncology, Istanbul, Turkey;
  • Hospital da Senhora da Oliveira Guimarães (PT)
  • University of Udine (IT)
  • Institut Català d'Oncologia (ES)
  • Five Prime Therapeutics (United States) (US)
  • University of Chicago Medical Center (US)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2021-01-20
Volume
39
Issue
3_suppl
Pages
160-160
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W3125059937
Cited by
76
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 28
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
Funders
Five Prime Therapeutics
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fibroblast Growth Factor Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Keywords
FGFR2b, gastric cancer, gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, FOLFOX6, first-line therapy, progression-free survival, overall survival, antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, FGFR2 amplification, circulating tumor DNA, metastatic gastric cancer, targeted therapy, combination therapy, fighting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review