Cited by 9Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology ResearchStatistical Methods in Clinical TrialsPancreatitis Pathology and Treatment

Precision Promise (PrP): an adaptive, multi-arm registration trial in metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC)

Picozzi, Vincent J., Duliege, Anne-Marie, Collisson, Eric Andrew, Maitra, Anirban, Hidalgo, Manuel, Hendifar, Andrew Eugene, Beatty, Gregory Lawrence, Doss, Sudheer +6 more·2022·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

TPS4188 Background: The success rate of drug development in PDAC is disappointingly low.PrP is a transformative, adaptive platform clinical trial designed to continuously evaluate many novel therapeutic options while increasing the probability that patients (pts) are randomized to effective experimental therapies. It cultivates enhanced cooperation among groups representing pts advocacy, pharmaceutical companies, academia, and the FDA. This patient-centric study aims to become the largest Phase 3 registrational study in PDAC and represents a fundamental shift in drug development for PDAC in the United States (US). Methods: PrP (NCT04229004) is a platform clinical trial sponsored by the Pancreatic Cancer Action Network (PanCAN), developed based on the FDA 2020 guidance document regarding "complex innovative designs" in registration trials https://www.fda.gov/media/130897/download . It utilizes adaptive randomization and other Bayesian statistical innovations provided by Berry Consultants LLC, including the “time machine” which uses all previously randomized controls for each arm, suitably adjusted for line of therapy and the time period of the arm. Focused on 1 st and 2 nd line treatment of mPDAC, PrP uses an adaptive platform design with randomization to one of 2 control arms (gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel (GA) or mFOLFIRINOX, 30% of pts) or experimental therapy (70% of pts). Candidate experimental arms are reviewed by an Arm Selection Committee based on validity of the treatment target and strength of the pre-clinical and clinical data. The primary endpoint is overall survival (OS). Pts undergo pre- and on-treatment biopsies with state-of-the-art genomic, transcriptomic, and immune analysis, along with a serial collection of blood-based research samples. Pts are managed using novel supportive care techniques; PrP contains 3 sub-protocols evaluating quality of life, sarcopenia, and actigraphy. PrP launched in 2020 and has enrolled > 130 pts; 30 US sites have been selected with 17 currently active. Current experimental arms include: (i) GA + Pamrevlumab, an anti-CTGF Ab, (ii) Racemetyrosine monotherapy, a cancer metabolism-based therapy (for follow-up of patients) and (iii) an immuno-oncology arm in activation. Other arms are in the planning stages. Compared to traditional designs, PrP offers several advantages: multiple investigational treatments evaluated in parallel over time; ̃175 pts per experimental arm required to initiate a regulatory registration; and continuous learning from every patient, resulting in significant savings of time and resources. PrP has created an entirely new learning environment for accelerating drug development in PDAC. Clinical trial information: NCT04229004.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.tps4188

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Partly because conventional PDAC drug development has been difficult, the field is shifting from large empirical trials to smaller trials with extensive correlative analyses of response and resistance mechanisms.

    “In fact, partly driven by the challenging trajectory of “conventional” drug development in PDAC, there has been an evolving shift from large, empirical trials towards those that are focused on fewer patient numbers, but which feature in-depth correlative studies that provide insights into mechanisms of response and resistance184,292,293.”

    From Pancreatic cancer: Advances and challenges (2023) · cites this paper as [293]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Picozzi, V. J., Duliege, A.-M., Collisson, E. A., Maitra, A., Hidalgo, M., Hendifar, A. E., Beatty, G. L., Doss, S., Matrisian, L. M., Herena, P. S., Fleshman, J., Detry, M. A., Berry, D. A., & Simeone, D. M.
Affiliations
  • Virginia Mason Medical Center (US)
  • Pancreatic Cancer Action Network, Manhattan Beach, CA;
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
  • Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US)
  • Abramson Cancer Center (US)
  • Pancreatic Cancer Action Network (US)
  • Berry Consultants, LLC (United States) (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2022-06-01
Volume
40
Issue
16_suppl
Pages
TPS4188-TPS4188
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W4281625581
Cited by
9
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • PanCAN
  • Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company.
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
Keywords
metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, adaptive platform trial, Bayesian adaptive design, gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel, modified FOLFIRINOX, connective tissue growth factor, cancer metabolism, cancer immunotherapy, overall survival

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review