PASS-01: pancreatic adenocarcinoma signature stratification for treatment–01
Abstract
TPS635 Background: Over 70% of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) present with metastatic disease where the mainstay of treatment is combination chemotherapy. Two pivotal phase III trials showed survival benefit of mFOLFIRINOX (mFFX) and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (GnP), respectively, compared to gemcitabine alone. Both are considered standard 1st line treatment options but have not been compared prospectively. Other than the BRCA phenotype there are no predictive molecular markers to identify which patients will benefit from mFFX versus GnP. Growing data suggests that RNA signatures and GATA6 expression may predict response to chemotherapy. Genomic platforms do identify small subsets of patients who may benefit from a targeted approach however, impact has been small. Patient-derived organoids (PDOs) are now feasible to passage for drug pharmacotyping that could inform drug therapy approaches. Combining all molecular strategies in real time including genomics, RNA signatures and adding PDO drug sensitivities could enable better precision choices for more patients with metastatic PDAC. Methods: PASS-01 is a multi-institutional randomized phase II trial evaluating the benefit of 1st line mFFX vs GnP in de novo metastatic PDAC patients with good PS who have undergone baseline tumor biopsies with tissue prepared for whole genome (WGS) and RNA sequencing and PDO generation/pharmacotyping using standard and novel drugs. The 1 0 objective is to determine the PFS benefit of mFFX compared to GnP as 1st line treatment with 80% power to detect a median PFS of 7 vs 5 months, favoring mFFX. 27 of a planned 150 patients have been accrued to date. Secondary endpoints include ORR (RECIST), DOR, OS by chemotherapy and biomarkers of therapy response including GATA-6 as a surrogate biomarker for the Moffit RNA classifier. Exploratory objectives include: to evaluate if each PDO DNA/RNA signature matches the patient and if the PDO chemotherapy sensitivities correlate to the patient’s 1st line response; to evaluate the benefit in switching patients to 2nd line treatment based on PDO drug sensitivity; to evaluate novel agents derived from PDO pharmacotyping and potential findings from profiling in 2nd/3rd line treatment; to explore retrospectively whether serial cell-free circulating tumor DNA analysis, circulating tumor cells and CA19.9 could reflect potential early predictors of emerging or de novo resistance and explore biomarkers of immune-oncologic sensitivity with multiplex immunohistochemistry. Each patient’s WGS and PDO data is discussed at a combined tumor board with study investigators immediately following their 1st 8-week CT and ongoing as data develops with the goal of recommending precision treatment choices back to their treating investigator. References: Conroy T et al. NEJM, 2011.; Von Hoff DD et al. NEJM,2013; Aung KL et al. CCR 2017; O’Kane G et al. CCR 2019; Tiriac H et al. Can Discov, 2018. Clinical trial information: NCT04469556.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Partly because conventional PDAC drug development has been difficult, the field is shifting from large empirical trials to smaller trials with extensive correlative analyses of response and resistance mechanisms.
“In fact, partly driven by the challenging trajectory of “conventional” drug development in PDAC, there has been an evolving shift from large, empirical trials towards those that are focused on fewer patient numbers, but which feature in-depth correlative studies that provide insights into mechanisms of response and resistance184,292,293.”
From Pancreatic cancer: Advances and challenges (2023) · cites this paper as [292]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pancreatic cancer: Advances and challenges
Halbrook, C. J., Lyssiotis, C. A., Pasca di Magliano, M., & Maitra, A. (2023) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2023.02.014 · Cited by 1,321 · see citing works
- Authors
- Knox, J. J., Jaffee, E. M., O'Kane, G. M., Plenker, D., Zhang, A., Ramotar, S., Dodd, A., Prince, R. M., Laheru, D., Yu, K. H., Saif, W. M., Elimova, E., Pishvaian, M. J., Perez, K., Aguirre, A., Fischer, S., Wilson, J., Notta, F., Tuveson, D. A., & Gallinger, S.
- Affiliations
- University Health Network (CA)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (CA)
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory (US)
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research (CA)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
- Northwell Cancer Institute, New Hyde Park, NY;
- Georgetown University Medical Center (US)
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada;
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2022-02-01
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 4_suppl
- Pages
- TPS635-TPS635
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W4205476752
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2
- Type
- conference abstract
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Institutional Repository (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Stand Up 2 Cancer, Lustgarten Foundation, Pancreatic Cancer Canada, Ontario Institute of Cancer Research.
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
- Keywords
- pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, metastatic pancreatic cancer, first-line chemotherapy, modified FOLFIRINOX, gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel, patient-derived organoids, pharmacotyping, GATA6, predictive biomarkers, treatment response, progression-free survival, drug resistance, circulating tumor DNA
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review