Cited by 11Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and ApplicationsMedical Imaging Techniques and ApplicationsProstate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Tumor dosimetry of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: Results from the VISION trial sub-study.

Abstract

5046 Background: In VISION, lutetium (177 Lu) vipivotide tetraxetan ([177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617; 177 Lu-PSMA-617) plus protocol-permitted standard of care (SoC) significantly improved overall survival and radiographic progression-free survival compared with SoC alone, in patients with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-positive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. In a VISION dosimetry sub-study, 177 Lu-PSMA-617 had a good safety profile with low radiotoxicity in at-risk organs. Here, we estimated the dosimetry of tumors after administration of 177 Lu-PSMA-617. Methods: The VISION sub-study was performed in a separate cohort of 29 non-randomized participants at four sites in Germany. Eligible patients received 177 Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq every 6 weeks, ≤ 6 cycles) plus SoC. Patients underwent single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) scans at approximately 2, 24, 48 and 168 hours after the first administration of 177 Lu-PSMA-617 (Cycle 1). Up to five tumors in each patient were selected according to tumor size and relative activity uptake. Tumor delineation, volume and morphology were determined using positron emission tomography (PET)/CT images. Kinetic (time-activity) data was determined using SPECT images and the application of phantom derived recovery coefficients. Tumor dosimetry was estimated using the standard Medical Internal Radiation Dose/Radiation Dose Assessment Resource (MIRD/RADAR) method for internal dosimetry. S-values were determined using CT-derived tumor volumes and tissue type as input to the Internal Dose Assessed by Computer (IDAC-Dose) 2.1 program. Tumor dosimetry estimates were reported as absorbed dose per unit activity (Gy/GBq) and cumulative estimated absorbed dose (Gy) over all 6 cycles (44.4 GBq cumulative activity). Results: In total, 104 tumors were analyzed after administration of 177 Lu-PSMA-617 in Cycle 1. Tumor sites included bone (n = 84), lymphatic tissue (n = 18), lung tissue (n = 1) and soft tissue (n = 1). Mean tumor mass by site was 14.6 (standard deviation [SD], 29.8; range, 0.49–224) g for bone and 12.5 (15.9; 0.68–60.7) g for lymphatic tissue. The mean radiation-absorbed dose for all tumors was 6.5 (SD, 8.4; range, 0.13–55) Gy/GBq, and the median absorbed dose was 4.4 Gy/GBq. The mean radiation-absorbed dose by tumor site was 5.4 (SD, 6.0; range, 0.13–45) Gy/GBq for bone and 9.7 (12; 0.99–55) Gy/GBq for lymphatic tissue. The 6-cycle cumulative estimated absorbed dose for all tumors was 287 (SD, 373; range, 5.7–2432) Gy. The 6-cycle cumulative estimated absorbed dose by tumor site was 240 (SD, 268; range, 5.7–2010) Gy for bone and 429 (549; 44–2432) Gy for lymphatic tissue. Conclusions: Tumor dosimetry estimates after administration of 177 Lu-PSMA-617 in the VISION sub-study patient population were consistent with previously published estimates. Clinical trial information: NCT03511664 .

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2023.41.16_suppl.5046

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Krause, B. J., Chi, K. N., Sartor, A. O., Fizazi, K., Morris, M. J., De Bono, J. S., Tagawa, S. T., Herrmann, K., Kurth, J., Eiber, M., Lassmann, M., Jentzen, W., Sparks, R., Baca, N., Nguyen, Q., Blumenstein, L., Klein, P., Wilke, C., Basque, J.-R., & Rahbar, K.
Affiliations
  • Universitätsmedizin Rostock (DE)
  • Vancouver Prostate Centre (CA)
  • Tulane Cancer Center, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA
  • Université Paris-Saclay (FR)
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
  • NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital (US)
  • Essen University Hospital (DE)
  • Technical University of Munich (DE)
  • University of Würzburg (DE)
  • CDE Dosimetry Services, Knoxville, TN
  • CDE Dosimetry Services, Inc., Knoxville, TN
  • Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research (CH)
  • Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, East Hanover, NJ
  • Novartis (Switzerland) (CH)
  • University Hospital Münster (DE)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2023-06-01
Volume
41
Issue
16_suppl
Pages
5046-5046
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W4379335339
Cited by
11
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
Funders
Advanced Accelerator Applications, a Novartis Company
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
177Lu-PSMA-617, tumor dosimetry, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, PSMA-positive prostate cancer, internal dosimetry, absorbed dose, time-activity curves, S-values, bone metastasis, VISION trial, radiotoxicity, radionuclide therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review