Cited by 36CAR-T cell therapy researchMultiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsProtein Degradation and Inhibitors

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Updated results of a phase I, open-label study of BCMA/CD19 dual-targeting fast CAR-T GC012F for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).

Abstract

8005 Background: GC012F is a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy with B cell maturation antigen (BCMA) and CD19 dual-target developed on the novel FasT CAR-T platform enabling 22-36 h manufacturing. Our previous results were presented at ASCO and EHA 2022 for 29 pts (NCT04236011; NCT04182581), which demonstrated GC012F treatment led to deep and durable response in RRMM pts. Furthermore, initial results showed that GC012F showed considerable efficacy and safety in high-risk transplant-eligible newly diagnosed MM pts (Blood 2022; 140 (Supplement 1): 889–890). Here we present update on RRMM study with a longer median follow-up. Methods: From October 2019 to January 2022, 29 heavily pretreated RRMM pts (age 27-76) with a median of 5 prior lines therapies (range 2-9) received GC012F. 26 (89.7%) pts were high risk (HR- mSMART), 8 (27.6%) pts had EM disease, 24 (82.8%) pts were refractory to last therapy. 10 (34.5%) pts had received prior anti-CD38 and 11 (37.9%) pts were treated with auto-HSCT. After lymphodepletion over 2-3 days (30 mg/m 2/d, 300mg/m 2/d Flu/Cy), GC012F was administered as single infusion at 3 dose levels: 1x10 5/kg (DL1) n=2, 2x10 5/kg (DL2) n=10 and 3x10 5/kg (DL3) n=17. Results: At the time of data cut-off (January 30, 2023), 29 eligible pts had been evaluated for response with the last patient completed 12 months efficacy follow up. Overall response rate was 93.1% (27/29), stringent complete response rate was 82.8% (24/29), ≥very good partial response rate was 89.7% (26/29). All patients dosed (29/29) achieved MRD negativity by flow cytometry (sensitivity 10-4-10-6). To date 24/29 patients (82.8%) achieved MRD- sCR across all dose levels. According to the Kaplan-Meier method, the median duration of response (DOR) was 37.0 months (95%CI, 11.0-NR) and the median progression free survival (PFS) was 38.0 months (95%CI, 11.8-NR). Cytokine Release Syndrome (CRS) was reported in 25 (86.2%) pts, which was mostly ≤grade 2 (n=23, 79.3%) and 2 (6.9%) pts were grade 3. No ICANS was observed (Graded by ASBMT criteria). Median duration of CRS was 3 days (1-8 d). PK results showed no difference amongst dose levels DL1 to DL3. The median time of persistence was 410 days (range: 51-1183) and GC012F was still detectable in 23 (79.3%) pts at 6 months and in 16 (55.2%) pts at 12 months after infusion. sBCMA plasma levels started declining at day 4 in 80% (8/10) patients, falling sharply at day 10 in 100% (19/19), and reaching minimal levels from 30 to 60 days post infusion in 100% (29/29) patients. Conclusions: The updated results showed GC012F continues to provide deep and durable responses, and a very high MRD negativity ratein RRMM pts, including in pts refractory to anti-CD38, PIs and IMIDs. Based on these promising results of the study of GC012F for RRMM, further clinical studies will be conducted to confirm the efficacy of GC012F. Clinical trial information: NCT04236011 ; NCT04182581 .

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2023.41.16_suppl.8005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In an open-label phase I study of GC012F for RRMM, the ORR was 93.1%, sCR was 82.8%, and VGPR was 89.7%.

    “The reported the ORR was 93.1%, sCR was 82.8%, and VGPR was 89.7%.”

    From Multiple myeloma: signaling pathways and targeted therapy (2024) · cites this paper as [253]

  • All patients in that study achieved MRD negativity.

    “All patients achieved MRD negativity.”

    From Multiple myeloma: signaling pathways and targeted therapy (2024) · cites this paper as [253]

  • The median follow-up was 30.7 months, mDOR was 37.0 months, and mPFS was 38.0 months.

    “The median follow-up was 30.7 months, mDOR was 37.0 months, and mPFS was 38.0 months [253].”

    From Multiple myeloma: signaling pathways and targeted therapy (2024) · cites this paper as [253]

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Du, J., Fu, W.-J., Jiang, H., Dong, B., Gao, L., Liu, L., Ge, J., He, A., Li, L., Lu, J., Chen, X., Liu, J., Zhang, Q., He, J., Shen, L., Weng, L., Zhang, H., Cao, W., & Li, W.
Affiliations
  • Shanghai Changzheng Hospital (CN)
  • Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Shanghai, China
  • Xijing Hospital (CN)
  • Army Medical University (CN)
  • Tang Du Hospital (CN)
  • First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University (CN)
  • Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN)
  • Gracell Biotechnologies Ltd, Shanghai, China
  • Gracell Biotechnologies, Ltd, Shanghai, China
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2023-06-01
Volume
41
Issue
16_suppl
Pages
8005-8005
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W4379339320
Cited by
35
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 7
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
Funders
Gracell Biotechnologies Ltd, Shanghai, China
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › CAR-T cell therapy research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
Keywords
relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, CAR T cell manufacturing, high-risk myeloma, stringent complete response, progression-free survival, overall survival, minimal residual disease, dose escalation, autologous stem cell transplantation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review