The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Updated results of a phase I, open-label study of BCMA/CD19 dual-targeting fast CAR-T GC012F for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).
Abstract
8005 Background: GC012F is a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy with B cell maturation antigen (BCMA) and CD19 dual-target developed on the novel FasT CAR-T platform enabling 22-36 h manufacturing. Our previous results were presented at ASCO and EHA 2022 for 29 pts (NCT04236011; NCT04182581), which demonstrated GC012F treatment led to deep and durable response in RRMM pts. Furthermore, initial results showed that GC012F showed considerable efficacy and safety in high-risk transplant-eligible newly diagnosed MM pts (Blood 2022; 140 (Supplement 1): 889–890). Here we present update on RRMM study with a longer median follow-up. Methods: From October 2019 to January 2022, 29 heavily pretreated RRMM pts (age 27-76) with a median of 5 prior lines therapies (range 2-9) received GC012F. 26 (89.7%) pts were high risk (HR- mSMART), 8 (27.6%) pts had EM disease, 24 (82.8%) pts were refractory to last therapy. 10 (34.5%) pts had received prior anti-CD38 and 11 (37.9%) pts were treated with auto-HSCT. After lymphodepletion over 2-3 days (30 mg/m 2/d, 300mg/m 2/d Flu/Cy), GC012F was administered as single infusion at 3 dose levels: 1x10 5/kg (DL1) n=2, 2x10 5/kg (DL2) n=10 and 3x10 5/kg (DL3) n=17. Results: At the time of data cut-off (January 30, 2023), 29 eligible pts had been evaluated for response with the last patient completed 12 months efficacy follow up. Overall response rate was 93.1% (27/29), stringent complete response rate was 82.8% (24/29), ≥very good partial response rate was 89.7% (26/29). All patients dosed (29/29) achieved MRD negativity by flow cytometry (sensitivity 10-4-10-6). To date 24/29 patients (82.8%) achieved MRD- sCR across all dose levels. According to the Kaplan-Meier method, the median duration of response (DOR) was 37.0 months (95%CI, 11.0-NR) and the median progression free survival (PFS) was 38.0 months (95%CI, 11.8-NR). Cytokine Release Syndrome (CRS) was reported in 25 (86.2%) pts, which was mostly ≤grade 2 (n=23, 79.3%) and 2 (6.9%) pts were grade 3. No ICANS was observed (Graded by ASBMT criteria). Median duration of CRS was 3 days (1-8 d). PK results showed no difference amongst dose levels DL1 to DL3. The median time of persistence was 410 days (range: 51-1183) and GC012F was still detectable in 23 (79.3%) pts at 6 months and in 16 (55.2%) pts at 12 months after infusion. sBCMA plasma levels started declining at day 4 in 80% (8/10) patients, falling sharply at day 10 in 100% (19/19), and reaching minimal levels from 30 to 60 days post infusion in 100% (29/29) patients. Conclusions: The updated results showed GC012F continues to provide deep and durable responses, and a very high MRD negativity ratein RRMM pts, including in pts refractory to anti-CD38, PIs and IMIDs. Based on these promising results of the study of GC012F for RRMM, further clinical studies will be conducted to confirm the efficacy of GC012F. Clinical trial information: NCT04236011 ; NCT04182581 .
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In an open-label phase I study of GC012F for RRMM, the ORR was 93.1%, sCR was 82.8%, and VGPR was 89.7%.
“The reported the ORR was 93.1%, sCR was 82.8%, and VGPR was 89.7%.”
From Multiple myeloma: signaling pathways and targeted therapy (2024) · cites this paper as [253]
All patients in that study achieved MRD negativity.
“All patients achieved MRD negativity.”
From Multiple myeloma: signaling pathways and targeted therapy (2024) · cites this paper as [253]
The median follow-up was 30.7 months, mDOR was 37.0 months, and mPFS was 38.0 months.
“The median follow-up was 30.7 months, mDOR was 37.0 months, and mPFS was 38.0 months [253].”
From Multiple myeloma: signaling pathways and targeted therapy (2024) · cites this paper as [253]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Multiple myeloma: signaling pathways and targeted therapy
Lu, Q., Yang, D., Li, H., Niu, T., & Tong, A. (2024) · Molecular biomedicine · doi:10.1186/s43556-024-00188-w · Cited by 90
Ho, M., Zanwar, S., & Paludo, J. (2023) · European Journal Of Haematology · doi:10.1111/ejh.14074 · Cited by 34
Multiple Myeloma: The Role of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in the Era of Immunotherapy
Rocchi, S., Zannetti, B. A., Marconi, G., & Lanza, F. (2024) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells13100853 · Cited by 30
van de Donk, N. V., Moreau, P., San-Miguel, J., Mateos, M.-V., Dimopoulos, M., Zweegman, S., Gay, F., Engelhardt, M., Mina, R., Zamagni, E., et al. (2025) · The Lancet Haematology · doi:10.1016/s2352-3026(25)00117-6 · Cited by 26
B-Cell Maturation Antigen/CD19 Dual-Targeting Immunotherapy in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma
Qiang, W.-T., Lu, J., Jia, Y., Liu, J., Liu, J., He, H., Wang, X.-X., Fan, X., Jin, L., Ruan, Q., et al. (2024) · JAMA Oncology · doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.2172 · Cited by 27
Self-citationCurrent Novel Targeted Therapeutic Strategies in Multiple Myeloma
Lin, C. (.-T., Tariq, M., Ullah, F., Sannareddy, A., Khalid, F., Abbas, H., Bader, A., Samaras, C., Valent, J., Khouri, J., et al. (2024) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms25116192 · Cited by 25
Immunotherapy of Multiple Myeloma: Current Status as Prologue to the Future
Abramson, H. N. (2023) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms242115674 · Cited by 23
van de Donk, N. W. C. J., Moreau, P., Miguel, J. F. S., Mateos, M., Dimopoulos, M. A., Zweegman, S., Gay, F., Engelhardt, M., Mina, R., Zamagni, E., et al. (2025) · HemaSphere · doi:10.1002/hem3.70260 · Cited by 20
Updates on CAR T cell therapy in multiple myeloma
Nasiri, F., Asaadi, Y., Mirzadeh, F., Abdolahi, S., Molaei, S., Piri‐Gavgani, S., & Rahbarizadeh, F. (2024) · Biomarker Research · doi:10.1186/s40364-024-00634-5 · Cited by 20
Wu, J. F., & Dhakal, B. (2023) · Journal of Hematology & Oncology · doi:10.1186/s13045-023-01479-5 · Cited by 18
Current use of CAR T cells to treat multiple myeloma
Firestone, R., & Mailankody, S. (2023) · Hematology · doi:10.1182/hematology.2023000434 · Cited by 18
Antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific antibodies and CAR-T cells therapy in multiple myeloma
Tacchetti, P., Talarico, M., Barbato, S., Pantani, L., Mancuso, K., Rizzello, I., Zamagni, E., & Cavo, M. (2024) · Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy · doi:10.1080/14737140.2024.2344647 · Cited by 16
Hou, J., Li, Y., & Lin, Q. (2023) · Experimental Hematology and Oncology · doi:10.1186/s40164-023-00436-9 · Cited by 15
Beyond BCMA: newer immune targets in myeloma
Tan, M. S. Y., Chen, Y.-X., & Smith, E. L. (2024) · Blood Advances · doi:10.1182/bloodadvances.2023010856 · Cited by 12
Novel Treatment Options for Multiple Myeloma
Portuguese, A. J., Banerjee, R. K., Chen, G. Z., Reddi, S., & Cowan, A. J. (2025) · JCO Oncology Practice · doi:10.1200/op-24-00752 · Cited by 13
Next-Generation Therapies for Multiple Myeloma
Meermeier, E. W., Bergsagel, P. L., & Chesi, M. (2024) · Annual Review of Cancer Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-cancerbio-061421-014236 · Cited by 12
Targeting BCMA in multiple myeloma: designs, challenges, and future directions
Hu, Y., Xie, Y., Wang, X., Yang, L., Geng, H., Yi, Z., Zhang, Y., Ma, L., & Chen, F. (2025) · Cancer Immunology Immunotherapy · doi:10.1007/s00262-024-03913-0 · Cited by 11
Chen, D., Zhu, Y., Zhi, C., Jiang, S., He, H., Qiang, W., Fang, X., Sun, X., & Du, J. (2024) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-24-0414 · Cited by 10
Self-citationUpdate on the current and future use of CAR‐T to treat multiple myeloma
Gahvari, Z. J., Brunner, M., Schmidt, T. M., & Callander, N. S. (2023) · European Journal Of Haematology · doi:10.1111/ejh.14145 · Cited by 9
Cani, L., Parikh, R., Joseph, N. S., Gupta, V. A., Hofmeister, C. C., Kaufman, J. L., Nooka, A. K., Lonial, S., & Mina, R. (2026) · Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma & Leukemia · doi:10.1016/j.clml.2026.03.003 · Cited by 8
Are we there yet? CAR ‐T therapy in multiple myeloma
Mirvis, E., & Benjamin, R. (2024) · British Journal of Haematology · doi:10.1111/bjh.19896 · Cited by 8
Future perspectives on novel CAR-T therapeutics beyond CD19 and BCMA in onco-hematology
Ershova, A., Goldaeva, A., Staliarova, A., Bulatov, E., Petukhov, A., & Barlev, N. A. (2025) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2025.1592377 · Cited by 8
O’Sullivan, A., Case, S., McCrudden, A., Hackett, E. E., Gallagher, L., Martin, D., Johnson, G. P., Mahadik, K., Kienzle, T., Lim, J. K., et al. (2024) · Molecular Therapy — Methods & Clinical Development · doi:10.1016/j.omtm.2024.101389 · Cited by 5
Rajeeve, S., Hoskote, A., & Mailankody, S. (2024) · Seminars in Hematology · doi:10.1053/j.seminhematol.2024.09.001 · Cited by 5
Mancuso, K., Barbato, S., Talarico, M., Tacchetti, P., Zamagni, E., & Cavo, M. (2024) · Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy · doi:10.1080/14712598.2024.2433518 · Cited by 5
Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells in the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma
Hasanali, Z. S., Razzo, B. M., Susanibar-Adaniya, S. P., Garfall, A. L., Stadtmauer, E. A., & Cohen, A. D. (2023) · Hematology/Oncology Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.hoc.2023.12.004 · Cited by 5
Progress of immune senescence in multiple myeloma treatment resistance
Jia, Y., Yan, L., Fan, C., Sun, H., Zhou, X., & Shi, Z. (2025) · Discover Oncology · doi:10.1007/s12672-025-02136-8 · Cited by 3
CAR-T cell therapy for patients with extramedullary multiple myeloma:Opportunities and challenges
Wang, Y., Hu, X., Du, J., & Liu, B. (2025) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2025.115374 · Cited by 2
Self-citationChimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for multiple myeloma
Liu, L., & Htut, M. (2025) · Current Opinion in Oncology · doi:10.1097/cco.0000000000001167 · Cited by 1
Self-citationCAR-T cell therapy for multiple myeloma: An update on the current state and future potential
Pophali, P. A., Rosenblatt, J. M., & Avigan, D. (2025) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Haematology · doi:10.1016/j.beha.2025.101659 · Cited by 1
Mapping the clinical landscape of multifunctional CAR T cells: Targets, trends, and synergies
Ogusuku, I. E. Y., Knelangen, N., Engels, B., Subklewe, M. S., & Lock, D. (2026) · Molecular Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2026.02.006 · Cited by 1
Overcoming five main challenges to targeting hematologic malignancies
Thakkar, M., Hanley, P. J., Bersenev, A., & Steffin, D. (2026) · Cytotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.jcyt.2026.102776 · Cited by 1
Gagelmann, N., & Merz, M. (2024) · Seminars in Hematology · doi:10.1053/j.seminhematol.2024.07.002 · Cited by 1
Min, C., Zhong, X., Cui, Y. J., Zhang, H., & Wang, Q. (2025) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2025.1515555 · Cited by 1
Self-citationHou, J., Li, Y., & Lin, Q. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26613047
Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy
Hays, P. V. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-14437-9_9
Metadata
- Authors
- Du, J., Fu, W.-J., Jiang, H., Dong, B., Gao, L., Liu, L., Ge, J., He, A., Li, L., Lu, J., Chen, X., Liu, J., Zhang, Q., He, J., Shen, L., Weng, L., Zhang, H., Cao, W., & Li, W.
- Affiliations
- Shanghai Changzheng Hospital (CN)
- Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Shanghai, China
- Xijing Hospital (CN)
- Army Medical University (CN)
- Tang Du Hospital (CN)
- First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University (CN)
- Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN)
- Gracell Biotechnologies Ltd, Shanghai, China
- Gracell Biotechnologies, Ltd, Shanghai, China
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2023-06-01
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 16_suppl
- Pages
- 8005-8005
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W4379339320
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 7
- Type
- conference abstract
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Gracell Biotechnologies Ltd, Shanghai, China
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › CAR-T cell therapy research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
- Keywords
- relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, CAR T cell manufacturing, high-risk myeloma, stringent complete response, progression-free survival, overall survival, minimal residual disease, dose escalation, autologous stem cell transplantation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review