The DOI matches its Crossref record.
EPCORE NHL-1 follicular lymphoma (FL) cycle (C) 1 optimization (OPT) cohort: expanding the clinical utility of epcoritamab in relapsed or refractory (R/R) FL
Open accessAbstract
7015 Background: Improving the safety of epcoritamab by reducing the incidence and severity of CRS and ICANS may enhance its accessibility and reduce healthcare resource utilization. In the pivotal EPCORE NHL-1 study (phase 1/2; NCT03625037), epcoritamab treatment (tx) led to high overall (ORR) and complete response (CR) rates of 82% and 63%, respectively, in a cohort of patients (pts) with R/R FL. Safety was manageable, with CRS events being primarily low grade. Here we report the first results from the fully enrolled EPCORE NHL-1 FL C1 OPT cohort investigating mitigation strategies for CRS with no mandatory hospitalization in pts with R/R FL receiving epcoritamab. Methods: Pts with CD20+ R/R FL (grade [G] 1–3A) with ≥2 prior tx lines received subcutaneous (SC) epcoritamab in 3 step-up doses (0.16, 0.8, and 3 mg) in C1, followed by 48-mg full doses in 28-d Cs (QW, C1–3; Q2W, C4–9; Q4W, C≥10) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Pts received dexamethasone prophylaxis and hydration recommendations in C1. Hospitalization for CRS monitoring was not mandated. The primary endpoints were rates of any-grade and G≥2 CRS. Secondary endpoints included response per Lugano criteria, minimal residual disease (MRD) in peripheral blood, and safety. Results: As of Jan 8, 2024, 86 pts with R/R FL were enrolled in this C1 OPT cohort (median follow-up, 5.7 mo). Pt characteristics were similar in the C1 OPT and pivotal cohorts. An overview of CRS, ICANS, and clinical tumor lysis syndrome (CTLS) events in these cohorts is in Table. CRS events primarily occurred during C1, and none led to epcoritamab discontinuation. Consistent with the lower rates of CRS with C1 OPT, IL-6 levels 24 h after the first full dose were lower than those observed in the pivotal cohort. Of 82 pts who received the first full dose in the C1 OPT cohort, 44 (54%) received outpatient CRS monitoring based on investigator discretion. Among 81 response-evaluable pts in the C1 OPT cohort, ORR was 91% and CR rate was 68%. Median times to response and CR were 1.4 mo and 1.5 mo, respectively. Among MRD-evaluable pts (n=44), MRD negativity was achieved in 64% (n=28). Conclusions: CRS mitigation measures in C1 further improved the safety of epcoritamab in pts with R/R FL by substantially reducing the rate and severity of CRS compared with previous reports. For pts treated in the outpatient setting, CRS was identified and appropriately treated, with few G2 events, no G≥3 events, and all events resolving. Response rates, MRD-negativity rate, and time to CR suggest that C1 OPT did not impact efficacy. These data support the potential use of SC epcoritamab as an off-the-shelf, outpatient tx option for pts with R/R FL. Clinical trial information: NCT03625037 . [Table: see text]
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Epcoritamab promotes natural killer cell activation and enhances rituximab-mediated cytotoxicity.
“Furthermore, epcoritamab promotes natural killer cell activation and enhances rituximab-mediated cytotoxicity. 18,19”
From Epcoritamab, lenalidomide, and rituximab versus lenalidomide and rituximab for relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma (EPCORE FL-1): a global, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. (2026) · cites this paper as [18]
The EPCORE NHL-1 rapid oral abstract reports epcoritamab response rates and safety in relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma, but does not discuss natural killer cell activation or rituximab-mediated cytotoxicity. Searches for those terms and for antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredPreclinical studies found minimal interference between epcoritamab and rituximab antitumour activity when combined, because each targets a different epitope on CD20.
“Unique among CD3 × CD20 T-cell engagers, preclinical studies have found minimal interference between epcoritamab and rituximab antitumour activity when combined, because each targets a different epitope on CD20.”
From Epcoritamab, lenalidomide, and rituximab versus lenalidomide and rituximab for relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma (EPCORE FL-1): a global, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. (2026) · cites this paper as [18]
The Methods and Results of the EPCORE NHL-1 C1 optimization abstract (page not provided) describe epcoritamab treatment in patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma, not preclinical combination studies. Searches for rituximab, CD20 epitopes, and interference with combined antitumour activity found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bispecific antibodies: advancing precision oncology
Herrera, M., Pretelli, G., Desai, J., Garralda, E., Siu, L. L., Steiner, T. M., & Au, L. (2024) · Trends in cancer · doi:10.1016/j.trecan.2024.07.002 · Cited by 190
Radtke, K. K., Bender, B. C., Li, Z., Turner, D. C., Roy, S., Belousov, A., & Li, C. (2024) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-24-2247 · Cited by 75
Self-citationFalchi, L., Nijland, M., Huang, H., Linton, K. M., Seymour, J. F., Tao, R., Kwiatek, M., Costa, A., Vassilakopoulos, T. P., Greil, R., et al. (2026) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(25)02360-8 · Cited by 41
Self-citationT cell engagers emerge as a compelling therapeutic modality
Baeuerle, P. A., Sauer, K., Grieshaber‐Bouyer, R., & Michaelson, J. S. (2025) · The Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.20251652 · Cited by 25
Miklos, D. B., Riedell, P. A., Bokun, A., Chávez, J. C., & Schuster, S. J. (2025) · Targeted Oncology · doi:10.1007/s11523-025-01133-9 · Cited by 11
Danilov, A. V., Kambhampati, S., Linton, K., Cumings, K., Chirikov, V., Mutebi, A., Chawla, S. B., Chhibber, A., Navarro, F. R., Gonçalves, F. M., et al. (2025) · Blood Advances · doi:10.1182/bloodadvances.2024015274 · Cited by 11
Self-citationMajor, A., Dueck, A. C., & Thanarajasingam, G. (2025) · The Lancet Haematology · doi:10.1016/s2352-3026(25)00035-3 · Cited by 10
Gurion, R., Guz, D., Kedmi, M., Perry, C., Avivi, I. M., Horowitz, N. A., Abadi, U., Gafter‐Gvili, A., Raanani, P., Goldschmidt, N., et al. (2025) · Annals of Hematology · doi:10.1007/s00277-025-06438-3 · Cited by 9
Improving CD3 bispecific antibody therapy in solid tumors using combination strategies
Lloyd, K. A., Middelburg, J., Ovcinnikovs, V., Pencheva, N., Kemper, K., & van Hall, T. (2025) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2025.1548446 · Cited by 5
Measurable Residual Disease Testing During Treatment with Bispecific Antibodies for Lymphoma
Jean-Louis, G., & Cherng, H.-J. J. (2025) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers17071153 · Cited by 3
Sinnollareddy, M., Sanghavi, K., Gibiansky, L. V., Li, T. R., Putnins, M., Mohamed, M. F., Patah, P., Favaro, E., Gupta, M., Parikh, A., et al. (2026) · Clinical Pharmacokinetics · doi:10.1007/s40262-026-01661-1
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Vose, J., Vitolo, U., Lugtenburg, P., Chamuleau, M. E. D., Linton, K. M., Thieblemont, C., Sonnevi, K., Jurczak, W., Olszewski, A. J., Awan, F. T., Okada, C. Y., Feldman, T. A., Hutchings, M., Favaro, E., Hoehn, D., Li, Z., Conlon, R., Sancho, J.-M., & Chavez, J. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Nebraska Medical Center (US)
- Candiolo Cancer Institute (IT)
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute (NL)
- Hovon (NL)
- University of Manchester (GB)
- Assistance Publique & Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Hôpital Saint-Louis, Hémato-oncologie, Université de Paris, Paris, France
- Karolinska Institutet (SE)
- The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology (PL)
- Brown University (US)
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
- Oregon Health & Science University (US)
- Hackensack University Medical Center (US)
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- Genmab (Denmark) (DK)
- Genmab (United States) (US)
- AbbVie (United States) (US)
- Institut Català d'Oncologia (ES)
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2024-06-01
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 16_suppl
- Pages
- 7015-7015
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W4400109173
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2
- Type
- conference abstract
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- This study was funded by Genmab A/S and AbbVie.
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › CAR-T cell therapy research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
- Keywords
- epcoritamab, relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma, cytokine release syndrome, immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome, tumor lysis syndrome, step-up dosing, dexamethasone prophylaxis, interleukin-6, minimal residual disease, subcutaneous administration, treatment safety, CD20
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review