Cited by 11Lymphoma Diagnosis and TreatmentCAR-T cell therapy researchChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

EPCORE NHL-1 follicular lymphoma (FL) cycle (C) 1 optimization (OPT) cohort: expanding the clinical utility of epcoritamab in relapsed or refractory (R/R) FL

Open access

Abstract

7015 Background: Improving the safety of epcoritamab by reducing the incidence and severity of CRS and ICANS may enhance its accessibility and reduce healthcare resource utilization. In the pivotal EPCORE NHL-1 study (phase 1/2; NCT03625037), epcoritamab treatment (tx) led to high overall (ORR) and complete response (CR) rates of 82% and 63%, respectively, in a cohort of patients (pts) with R/R FL. Safety was manageable, with CRS events being primarily low grade. Here we report the first results from the fully enrolled EPCORE NHL-1 FL C1 OPT cohort investigating mitigation strategies for CRS with no mandatory hospitalization in pts with R/R FL receiving epcoritamab. Methods: Pts with CD20+ R/R FL (grade [G] 1–3A) with ≥2 prior tx lines received subcutaneous (SC) epcoritamab in 3 step-up doses (0.16, 0.8, and 3 mg) in C1, followed by 48-mg full doses in 28-d Cs (QW, C1–3; Q2W, C4–9; Q4W, C≥10) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Pts received dexamethasone prophylaxis and hydration recommendations in C1. Hospitalization for CRS monitoring was not mandated. The primary endpoints were rates of any-grade and G≥2 CRS. Secondary endpoints included response per Lugano criteria, minimal residual disease (MRD) in peripheral blood, and safety. Results: As of Jan 8, 2024, 86 pts with R/R FL were enrolled in this C1 OPT cohort (median follow-up, 5.7 mo). Pt characteristics were similar in the C1 OPT and pivotal cohorts. An overview of CRS, ICANS, and clinical tumor lysis syndrome (CTLS) events in these cohorts is in Table. CRS events primarily occurred during C1, and none led to epcoritamab discontinuation. Consistent with the lower rates of CRS with C1 OPT, IL-6 levels 24 h after the first full dose were lower than those observed in the pivotal cohort. Of 82 pts who received the first full dose in the C1 OPT cohort, 44 (54%) received outpatient CRS monitoring based on investigator discretion. Among 81 response-evaluable pts in the C1 OPT cohort, ORR was 91% and CR rate was 68%. Median times to response and CR were 1.4 mo and 1.5 mo, respectively. Among MRD-evaluable pts (n=44), MRD negativity was achieved in 64% (n=28). Conclusions: CRS mitigation measures in C1 further improved the safety of epcoritamab in pts with R/R FL by substantially reducing the rate and severity of CRS compared with previous reports. For pts treated in the outpatient setting, CRS was identified and appropriately treated, with few G2 events, no G≥3 events, and all events resolving. Response rates, MRD-negativity rate, and time to CR suggest that C1 OPT did not impact efficacy. These data support the potential use of SC epcoritamab as an off-the-shelf, outpatient tx option for pts with R/R FL. Clinical trial information: NCT03625037 . [Table: see text]

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2024.42.16_suppl.7015

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Epcoritamab promotes natural killer cell activation and enhances rituximab-mediated cytotoxicity.

    “Furthermore, epcoritamab promotes natural killer cell activation and enhances rituximab-mediated cytotoxicity. 18,19”

    From Epcoritamab, lenalidomide, and rituximab versus lenalidomide and rituximab for relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma (EPCORE FL-1): a global, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. (2026) · cites this paper as [18]

    The EPCORE NHL-1 rapid oral abstract reports epcoritamab response rates and safety in relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma, but does not discuss natural killer cell activation or rituximab-mediated cytotoxicity. Searches for those terms and for antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Preclinical studies found minimal interference between epcoritamab and rituximab antitumour activity when combined, because each targets a different epitope on CD20.

    “Unique among CD3 × CD20 T-cell engagers, preclinical studies have found minimal interference between epcoritamab and rituximab antitumour activity when combined, because each targets a different epitope on CD20.”

    From Epcoritamab, lenalidomide, and rituximab versus lenalidomide and rituximab for relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma (EPCORE FL-1): a global, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. (2026) · cites this paper as [18]

    The Methods and Results of the EPCORE NHL-1 C1 optimization abstract (page not provided) describe epcoritamab treatment in patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma, not preclinical combination studies. Searches for rituximab, CD20 epitopes, and interference with combined antitumour activity found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Vose, J., Vitolo, U., Lugtenburg, P., Chamuleau, M. E. D., Linton, K. M., Thieblemont, C., Sonnevi, K., Jurczak, W., Olszewski, A. J., Awan, F. T., Okada, C. Y., Feldman, T. A., Hutchings, M., Favaro, E., Hoehn, D., Li, Z., Conlon, R., Sancho, J.-M., & Chavez, J. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Nebraska Medical Center (US)
  • Candiolo Cancer Institute (IT)
  • Erasmus MC Cancer Institute (NL)
  • Hovon (NL)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • Assistance Publique & Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Hôpital Saint-Louis, Hémato-oncologie, Université de Paris, Paris, France
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology (PL)
  • Brown University (US)
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
  • Hackensack University Medical Center (US)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Genmab (Denmark) (DK)
  • Genmab (United States) (US)
  • AbbVie (United States) (US)
  • Institut Català d'Oncologia (ES)
  • H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2024-06-01
Volume
42
Issue
16_suppl
Pages
7015-7015
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W4400109173
Cited by
10
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
This study was funded by Genmab A/S and AbbVie.
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › CAR-T cell therapy research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Keywords
epcoritamab, relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma, cytokine release syndrome, immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome, tumor lysis syndrome, step-up dosing, dexamethasone prophylaxis, interleukin-6, minimal residual disease, subcutaneous administration, treatment safety, CD20

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review