Cited by 2Colorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesCancer Genomics and DiagnosticsGenetic factors in colorectal cancer

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Association of candidate alterations with primary resistance to KRAS G12D targeting in colorectal cancer.

Open access
Jazieh, Khalid, Tsai, Jill, Zhu, Mojun, Xie, Hao·2024·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

170 Background: KRAS-mutant colorectal cancer (CRC) has a worse prognosis and greater resistance to therapy, attracting tremendous efforts to develop both allele-specific and pan-KRAS targeting agents including KRAS G12C and G12D inhibitors. CRC has demonstrated both primary and acquired resistance to KRAS G12C inhibitors, which can be better evaluated by circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)-based next generation sequencing (NGS) methods without tissue sampling bias. Here, we utilized clinical ctDNA data to delineate the landscape of candidate alterations associated with primary resistance to KRAS G12D targeting in CRC. Methods: Samples from advanced CRC patients with Guardant360 data in 2021 were categorized into a KRAS G12D group and comparator groups of KRAS G12C and KRAS not detected (ND) according to KRAS mutation status. Demographics, MSI-H status, and blood tumor mutational burden (bTMB) were summarized and compared between groups using t-test for continuous variables and Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables. Co-occurrence patterns of alterations between KRAS and other genes were assessed. Primary resistance mutations were inferred by acquired resistance findings to KRAS G12C inhibitors reported by Awad et al. N Engl J Med. 2021 and Tanaka et al. Cancer Discov. 2021. Results: Among approximately 2500 samples, 16.8% had KRAS G12D, the most common KRAS mutation in CRC. The mean allele frequency of KRAS G12D (11.4%) is comparable to that of KRAS G12C (10.9%). Mean age (61.6 years), MSI-H frequency (3.8%), and mean bTMB (14.2 Mut/Mb) of KRAS G12D group is comparable to those of KRAS ND group. This contrasts with KRAS G12C with significantly lower mean age (60.2 years, p=0.01), lower MSI-H frequency (0.56%, p=0.03), and higher mean bTMB (16.3 Mut/Mb, p=0.02) compared to KRAS ND. Both KRAS G12D and G12C significantly co-occur with APC, PIK3CA, and SMAD4 alterations. FBXW7, AR, and KEAP1 alterations were unique co-occurrences to KRAS G12D, while KIT was unique to KRAS G12C. Candidate alterations associated with primary resistance in KRAS G12D CRC included simultaneously present mutations of KRAS Q61H (14.1%), G12V (6.4%), G12C (5.9%), G13D (3.6%), BRAF V600E (2.7%) and others, amplification of MET (2%), MYC (1.6%), and KRAS (1.4%), and FGFR3-TACC3 translocation (Table). Conclusions: KRAS G12D is associated with unique co-occurring molecular alterations compared to KRAS G12C in CRC. ctDNA-based NGS platforms can survey candidate alterations associated with primary resistance to KRAS G12D targeting in CRC. Further validation in preclinical models is needed. [Table: see text]

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2024.42.3_suppl.170

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Co-occurrence of KEAP1 mutations was found in CRC patients treated with KRAS G12D inhibitors.

    “Co-occurrence of KEAP1 mutations was found in CRC patients treated with KRAS G12D inhibitors [154].”

    From Differential Response and Resistance to KRAS-Targeted Therapy (2025) · cites this paper as [154]

    The Results report KEAP1 alterations co-occurring with KRAS G12D in colorectal cancer. However, the Methods describe ctDNA samples grouped by mutation status, not patients treated with KRAS G12D inhibitors; the treatment qualifier is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Jazieh, K., Tsai, J., Zhu, M., & Xie, H.
Affiliations
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Guardant (United States) (US)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2024-01-20
Volume
42
Issue
3_suppl
Pages
170-170
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W4391091327
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
Funders
None.
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
Keywords
KRAS G12D, KRAS G12C, primary drug resistance, KRAS inhibitors, circulating tumor DNA, tumor mutational burden, microsatellite instability, APC, PIK3CA, SMAD4, FBXW7, Keap1, AR, co-occurring mutations, Guardant360, liquid biopsy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review