The DOI matches its Crossref record.
DB-1311/BNT324 (a novel B7H3 ADC) in patients with heavily pretreated castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).
Open accessAbstract
5015 Background: There is a high unmet need for effective therapy for patients (pts) with heavily pretreated CRPC. B7H3 ADCs have reported early clinical activity in CRPC, including DB-1311/BNT324, an investigational B7H3 ADC that received FDA Fast-Track Designation for previously treated CRPC. Methods: This phase 1/2 study (NCT05914116) enrolled pts with advanced/metastatic solid tumors, including previously treated CRPC (post docetaxel/hormonal therapy). Dose optimization cohorts randomized pts to receive 6 mg/kg or 9 mg/kg Q3W DB-1311/BNT324 until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR, based on investigator assessment per RECIST 1.1 and PCWG3 criteria) and safety. Secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DOR) and radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS). Results: As of 3 Jan 2025, of 393 pts treated with DB-1311/BNT324, there were 65 pts with CRPC. Median age was 71 years (range 45–84), 49%/34%/14% were White/Asian/Black, 32%/37%/31% from Australia/USA/East Asia, 71% had ECOG PS 1, 29% had bone only disease. Median number of prior lines was 3 (range 1–14) and 28% had ≥5 prior lines. Most pts received prior docetaxel (93.8%) and hormonal therapy (96.9%); other therapies included PARP inhibitors (PARPi, 15.4%), Lutetium-177 (Lu-177, 15.4%), immunotherapy (IO, 13.8%). Among 43 response-evaluable pts (measurable disease at baseline per RECIST 1.1), best overall response was PR in 12 pts and SD in 29 pts for an unconfirmed ORR of 27.9% (95% CI 15.3, 43.7; 12/43, 8 confirmed) and DCR of 95.3% (95% CI 84.2, 99.4). Median DOR was not reached (95% CI 4.2, ne). After a median follow-up of 5.7 months (m) (range 0.6–16.0), median rPFS (N=57) was 8.3 m (95% CI 6.7, ne) with a 6-m rate of 86.6% (95% CI 67.8, 94.8). Outcomes were similar by dose (6 mg/kg [ORR 26.3%, DCR 100%, 6-m rPFS rate 88.7%], 9 mg/kg [ORR 29.2%, DCR 91.7%, 6-m rPFS rate 80.0%]), by line of treatment (≤3L [ORR 33.3%, DCR 77.8%], ≥4L [ORR 26.7%, DCR 100%]), and by type of prior treatment (ORR/DCR: Lu-177 [25.0%/100%], IO [33.3%/100%], albeit lower for PARPi [16.7%/100%]). The CRPC safety profile (N=65) is supported by the safety in the larger overall population (N=393). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 56 (86.2%) and 343 (87.3%) pts and were Grade ≥3 (G≥3) in 26 (40.0%) and 156 (39.7%) pts, respectively. TRAEs led to dose reduction in 8 (12.3%) and 39 (9.9%) pts, to discontinuation in 4 (6.2%) and 23 (5.9%) pts, and to death in 0 and 2 (0.5%) pts, respectively. Nausea and hematological events, primarily G1–2, were the most common TRAEs. Hematological TRAEs occurred more frequently with 9 mg/kg vs 6 mg/kg, both in the CRPC and overall populations. Conclusions: DB-1311/BNT324 showed encouraging efficacy and a manageable safety profile in heavily pretreated CRPC and is currently being evaluated in post Lu-177 CRPC and in taxane-naïve CRPC. Clinical trial information: NCT05914116 .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Common TRAEs of DB-1311/BNT324 included gastrointestinal and hematologic toxicities; 31 patients (42.5%) experienced ≥grade 3 adverse events, and only 7 patients (9.6%) discontinued treatment due to toxicity.
“Common TRAEs included gastrointestinal and hematologic toxicities; 31 patients (42.5%) experienced ≥grade 3 adverse events, and only 7 patients (9.6%) discontinued treatment due to toxicity104,105.”
From The evolving landscape of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) for treatment of prostate cancer (2025) · cites this paper as [105]
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 1 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredOf 52 patients with RECIST evaluable tumors treated with DB-1311/BNT324, partial response was seen in 22 patients (ORR 42.3%) and stable disease in 25 patients (DCR 90.4%), with a 6-month radiographic progression free survival rate of 67.7%.
“Of the 52 patients with RECIST evaluable tumors, partial response was seen in 22 patients (objective response rate 42.3%) and stable disease was seen in 25 patients (disease control rate 90.4%), with a 6-month radiographic progression free survival rate of 67.7%104,105.”
From The evolving landscape of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) for treatment of prostate cancer (2025) · cites this paper as [105]
The Results (p. 1) report 43 RECIST response-evaluable patients, with 12 partial responses, 29 cases of stable disease, an ORR of 27.9%, and a DCR of 95.3%. They also report a six-month radiographic progression-free survival rate of 86.6%, not 67.7%. The cited paper therefore gives different figures for every numerical outcome attributed to it. (LLM, conf=0.94)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredPreliminary data from a phase I/II study including 73 patients with pretreated CRPC showed encouraging efficacy and a manageable safety profile for DB-1311/BNT324.
“Preliminary data from a phase I/II study including 73 patients with pre-treated CRPC showed encouraging efficacy and a manageable safety profile104,105.”
From The evolving landscape of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) for treatment of prostate cancer (2025) · cites this paper as [105]
The Methods and Conclusions (p. 1) identify a phase 1/2 study of previously treated CRPC and describe encouraging efficacy with a manageable safety profile. The Results (p. 1), however, report 65 patients with CRPC as of 3 January 2025, not 73. (LLM, conf=0.93)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The evolving landscape of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) for treatment of prostate cancer
Lin, C., Hadfield, M. J., Santopietro, A., Lagos, G., Cheng, L., El-Deiry, W. S., Aggarwal, R., Mega, A., Hyams, E., & Carneiro, B. A. (2025) · npj Precision Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41698-025-01131-0 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Parsonson, A. O., Gandhi, C., Henick, B. S., Schmidt, A. L., Ye, D., Amin, H., Wise-Draper, T. M., Courtney, K. D., Tam, L., Jiang, S., Gourdin, T. S., Lisberg, A., Tibes, R., Furlanetto, J., Fang, L., Qiu, Y., Shi, R., Wei, J., Zhang, B., & Stein, M. N.
- Affiliations
- Macquarie University (AU)
- BRCR Global (United States) (US)
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
- Sunshine Coast University Hospital (AU)
- Fudan University (CN)
- University of Cincinnati (US)
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
- Queensland Health (AU)
- Hunan Cancer Hospital (CN)
- Medical University of South Carolina (US)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- BioNTech (Germany) (DE)
- Duality Biotherapeutics, Inc. (China) (CN)
- Duality Biologics, Basking Ridge, NJ
- Duality Biologics, Princeton
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2025-06
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 16_suppl
- Pages
- 5015-5015
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W4410814312
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 2
- Type
- conference abstract
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Sponsored by Duality Biologics and conducted in collaboration with BioNTech SE.
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
- Keywords
- castration-resistant prostate cancer, docetaxel-refractory disease, objective response rate, disease control rate, progression-free survival, safety and tolerability, dose escalation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review