Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 22

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Rare Germline ATM Variants Influence the Development of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Lampson, Benjamin L., Gupta, Aditi, Tyekucheva, Svitlana, Mashima, Kiyomi, Petráčková, Anna, Wang, Zixu, Wojciechowska, Natalia, Shaughnessy, Conner J., Baker, Peter O., Fernandes, Stacey M., Shupe, Samantha, Machado, John-Hanson, Fardoun, Rayan, Kim, Annette S., Brown, Jennifer R.·2023·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: Germline missense variants of unknown significance in cancer-related genes are increasingly being identified with the expanding use of next-generation sequencing. The ataxia telangiectasia–mutated ( ATM) gene on chromosome 11 has more than 1,000 germline missense variants of unknown significance and is a tumor suppressor. We aimed to determine if rare germline ATM variants are more frequent in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) compared with other hematologic malignancies and if they influence the clinical characteristics of CLL. METHODS: We identified 3,128 patients (including 825 patients with CLL) in our hematologic malignancy clinic who had received clinical-grade sequencing of the entire coding region of ATM. We ascertained the comparative frequencies of germline ATM variants in categories of hematologic neoplasms, and, in patients with CLL, we determined whether these variants affected CLL-associated characteristics such as somatic 11q deletion. RESULTS: Rare germline ATM variants are present in 24% of patients with CLL, significantly greater than that in patients with other lymphoid malignancies (16% prevalence), myeloid disease (15%), or no hematologic neoplasm (14%). Patients with CLL with germline ATM variants are younger at diagnosis and twice as likely to have 11q deletion. The ATM variant p.L2307F is present in 3% of patients with CLL, is associated with a three-fold increase in rates of somatic 11q deletion, and is a hypomorph in cell-based assays. CONCLUSION: Germline ATM variants cluster within CLL and affect the phenotype of CLL that develops, implying that some of these variants (such as ATM p.L2307F) have functional significance and should not be ignored. Further studies are needed to determine whether these variants affect the response to therapy or account for some of the inherited risk of CLL.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.22.00269

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 69

  1. 10.1093/hmg/ddab141 · DOI
  2. 10.1001/jama.2017.7112 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1309/LMWZH57BRWOPR5RQ · DOI
  4. 10.1038/s41571-019-0179-3 · DOI
  5. 10.3389/fphar.2018.00909 · DOI
  6. 10.1056/NEJMoa1706450 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1001/jama.2018.13152 · DOI
  8. 10.1182/blood-2004-01-0341 · DOI
  9. 10.3324/haematol.2008.003632 · DOI
  10. 10.1182/blood.2019001362 · DOI
  11. 10.1177/2040620713495639 · DOI
  12. 10.3324/haematol.2009.006296 · DOI
  13. 10.1038/ng.219 · DOI
  14. 10.1038/ng.510 · DOI
  15. 10.1093/hmg/ddq044 · DOI
  16. 10.1038/leu.2012.173 · DOI
  17. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003220 · DOI
  18. 10.1182/blood-2005-12-5022 · DOI
  19. 10.1371/journal.pone.0101685 · DOI
  20. 10.3390/cancers13061340 · DOI
  21. 10.1038/leu.2017.201 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.07.053 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)10117-4 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.cell.2013.01.019 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1038/nature15395 · DOI
  26. 10.1038/nature14666 · DOI
  27. 10.1038/ng.1032 · DOI
  28. 10.1056/NEJM200012283432602 · DOI
  29. 10.1111/bjh.13933 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61381-5 · DOI
  31. 10.1200/JCO.2011.41.0852 · DOI
  32. 10.1093/annonc/11.suppl_1.S127 · DOI
  33. 10.1073/pnas.1314608110 · DOI
  34. 10.1182/blood.V91.10.3920.3920_3920_3926 · DOI
  35. 10.1182/blood.V78.12.3269.3269 · DOI
  36. 10.1182/blood-2002-02-0382 · DOI
  37. 10.1056/NEJMoa1801445 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1038/sj.leu.2403221 · DOI
  39. 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0945 · DOI
  40. 10.1200/JCO.2014.56.5101 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2016.02.003 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-12-0095 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1056/NEJMoa1605949 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1038/s41586-018-0623-z · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1038/s41586-019-1012-y · DOI
  46. 10.1056/NEJMoa1516192 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1182/blood-2013-08-518886 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1038/ng.3230 · DOI
  49. 10.1073/pnas.1121343109 · DOI
  50. 10.1182/blood-2013-02-483727 · DOI
  51. 10.1038/ng.3442 · DOI
  52. 10.1016/j.ccr.2013.12.015 · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-2116 · DOI
  54. 10.1038/ng.3691 · DOI
  55. 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.07.013 · DOI
  56. 10.1101/gr.9.8.677 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.1038/nature19057 · DOI · Paper page
  58. 10.1200/JCO.2007.11.2649 · DOI
  59. 10.1182/blood.2021011075 · DOI
  60. 10.1182/blood-2015-06-652941 · DOI · Paper page
  61. 10.1182/blood.V99.1.300 · DOI
  62. 10.3324/haematol.2011.048827 · DOI
  63. Swift M, 1986, Am J Hum Genet, 39, 573
  64. 10.3109/10428194.2012.668683 · DOI
  65. 10.1038/35101031 · DOI
  66. 10.1038/nprot.2015.123 · DOI · Paper page
  67. 10.1038/nmeth0410-248 · DOI · Paper page
  68. 10.1038/s41467-020-15905-6 · DOI
  69. 10.1038/s41586-021-03855-y · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Lampson, B. L., Gupta, A., Tyekucheva, S., Mashima, K., Petráčková, A., Wang, Z., Wojciechowska, N., Shaughnessy, C. J., Baker, P. O., Fernandes, S. M., Shupe, S., Machado, J.-H., Fardoun, R., Kim, A. S., & Brown, J. R.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2023-02-10
Volume
41
Issue
5
Pages
1116-1128
ISSN
  • 0732-183X
  • 1527-7755
Cited by
22
References
6
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review