Cited by 37

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Elevated C-Reactive Protein and Subsequent Patient-Reported Cognitive Problems in Older Breast Cancer Survivors: The Thinking and Living With Cancer Study

Carroll, Judith E., Nakamura, Zev M., Small, Brent J., Zhou, Xingtao, Cohen, Harvey J., Ahles, Tim A., Ahn, Jaeil, Bethea, Traci N., Extermann, Martine, Graham, Deena, Isaacs, Claudine, Jim, Heather S.L., Jacobsen, Paul B., McDonald, Brenna C., Patel, Sunita K., Rentscher, Kelly, Root, James, Saykin, Andrew J., Tometich, Danielle B., Van Dyk, Kathleen, Zhai, Wanting, Breen, Elizabeth C., Mandelblatt, Jeanne S.·2023·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine longitudinal relationships between levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) and cognition in older breast cancer survivors and noncancer controls. METHODS: English-speaking women age ≥ 60 years, newly diagnosed with primary breast cancer (stage 0-III), and frequency-matched controls were enrolled from September 2010 to March 2020; women with dementia, neurologic disorders, and other cancers were excluded. Assessments occurred presystemic therapy/enrollment and at annual visits up to 60 months. Cognition was measured using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function and neuropsychological testing. Mixed linear effect models tested for survivor-control differences in natural log (ln)-transformed CRP at each visit. Random effect–lagged fluctuation models tested directional effects of ln-CRP on subsequent cognition. All models controlled for age, race, study site, cognitive reserve, obesity, and comorbidities; secondary analyses evaluated if depression or anxiety affected results. RESULTS: There were 400 survivors and 329 controls with CRP specimens and follow-up data (average age of 67.7 years; range, 60-90 years). The majority of survivors had stage I (60.9%), estrogen receptor–positive (87.6%) tumors. Survivors had significantly higher adjusted mean ln-CRP than controls at baseline and 12-, 24-, and 60-month visits (all P < .05). Higher adjusted ln-CRP predicted lower participant-reported cognition on subsequent visits among survivors, but not controls ( P interaction = .008); effects were unchanged by depression or anxiety. Overall, survivors had adjusted Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function scores that were 9.5 and 14.2 points lower than controls at CRP levels of 3.0 and 10.0 mg/L. Survivors had poorer neuropsychological test performance ( v controls), with significant interactions with CRP only for the Trails B test. CONCLUSION: Longitudinal relationships between CRP and cognition in older breast cancer survivors suggest that chronic inflammation may play a role in development of cognitive problems. CRP testing could be clinically useful in survivorship care.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.22.00406

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 77

  1. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0729 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 2019, Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Program: SEER*Stat Database: Incidence—SEER 21 Regs Research Data, Nov 2018 Sub (2000-2016) <Katrina/Rita Population Adjustment>—Linked to County Attributes—Total U.S., 1969-2017 Counties
  3. 10.1002/cncr.32663 · DOI
  4. 10.1200/JCO.2014.55.1259 · DOI
  5. 10.1200/JCO.2009.27.0827 · DOI
  6. 10.3109/09540261.2013.864260 · DOI
  7. 10.1200/JCO.18.00140 · DOI
  8. 10.1002/pon.5433 · DOI
  9. 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181d0bef7 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.08.012 · DOI
  11. 10.1007/s00520-020-05950-8 · DOI
  12. 10.1007/s11764-019-00830-5 · DOI
  13. 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000248 · DOI
  14. 10.1038/nrc2073 · DOI
  15. 10.1200/JCO.21.00239 · DOI
  16. 10.1038/s41582-021-00617-2 · DOI
  17. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05726.x · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.10.005 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1200/JCO.2012.43.0116 · DOI
  20. 10.1111/nyas.13299 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.11.029 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1016/j.bbi.2019.04.008 · DOI
  23. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012997 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.bbi.2012.07.015 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2017.10.005 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2016.11.002 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.bbi.2012.05.017 · DOI
  28. 10.1093/jnci/djv131 · DOI
  29. 10.1186/s13058-018-1062-3 · DOI
  30. 10.1093/annonc/mdv206 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61717-7 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-0611 · DOI
  33. 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50157.x · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000052939.59093.45 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1200/JCO.2008.18.9068 · DOI
  36. 10.1093/jnci/djac022 · DOI
  37. 10.1007/s11682-013-9243-2 · DOI
  38. 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.1160 · DOI
  39. 10.1093/jnci/djab003 · DOI
  40. Wagner LI, 2009, J Support Oncol, 7, W32
  41. 10.1200/JCO.21.00239 · DOI
  42. 10.1200/JCO.2016.68.5826 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.12.011 · DOI
  44. 10.1186/s41687-018-0071-4 · DOI
  45. 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70294-1 · DOI
  46. 10.1097/WAD.0b013e318191c7dd · DOI
  47. Stern R, 2003, Neuropsychological Assessment Battery (NAB)
  48. 10.1093/arclin/acx142 · DOI
  49. 10.1016/j.jagp.2017.04.001 · DOI
  50. 10.1002/pon.742 · DOI
  51. 10.1177/014662167700100306 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Spielberger C, 1970, STAI Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
  53. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.649939 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.1002/cncr.32489 · DOI
  55. 10.4324/9781315744094 · DOI
  56. 10.1634/theoncologist.2013-0120 · DOI
  57. 10.1007/s00520-016-3400-2 · DOI
  58. 10.1016/j.tranon.2021.101297 · DOI
  59. 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.2047 · DOI
  60. 10.1172/JCI90609 · DOI · Paper page
  61. 10.3390/cancers12123842 · DOI
  62. 10.1038/s41571-021-00580-3 · DOI
  63. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.10.007 · DOI · Paper page
  64. 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgu028 · DOI
  65. 10.5665/sleep.4008 · DOI · Paper page
  66. 10.1038/s41416-018-0154-2 · DOI
  67. 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-20-0188 · DOI
  68. 10.1007/s00520-017-3724-6 · DOI
  69. 10.1371/journal.pone.0208593 · DOI
  70. 10.3857/roj.2014.32.3.103 · DOI
  71. 10.2147/OTT.S60114 · DOI
  72. 10.1016/j.bbi.2015.03.015 · DOI · Paper page
  73. 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01195 · DOI
  74. 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2021.577769 · DOI
  75. 10.1200/JCO.19.01866 · DOI
  76. 10.1007/s10549-008-9985-5 · DOI
  77. 10.1093/jnci/95.11.779 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Carroll, J. E., Nakamura, Z. M., Small, B. J., Zhou, X., Cohen, H. J., Ahles, T. A., Ahn, J., Bethea, T. N., Extermann, M., Graham, D., Isaacs, C., Jim, H. S. L., Jacobsen, P. B., McDonald, B. C., Patel, S. K., Rentscher, K., Root, J., Saykin, A. J., Tometich, D. B., Van Dyk, K., Zhai, W., Breen, E. C., & Mandelblatt, J. S.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2023-01-10
Volume
41
Issue
2
Pages
295-306
ISSN
  • 0732-183X
  • 1527-7755
Cited by
37
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Elevated C-Reactive Protein and Subsequent Patient-Reported Cognitive Problems in Older Breast Cancer Survivors: The Thinking and Living With Cancer Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.22.00406
The paper
Carroll, J. E., Nakamura, Z. M., Small, B. J., Zhou, X., Cohen, H. J., Ahles, T. A., Ahn, J., Bethea, T. N., Extermann, M., Graham, D., Isaacs, C., Jim, H. S. L., Jacobsen, P. B., McDonald, B. C., Patel, S. K., Rentscher, K., Root, J., Saykin, A. J., Tometich, D. B., . . . Mandelblatt, J. S. (2023). Elevated C-Reactive Protein and Subsequent Patient-Reported Cognitive Problems in Older Breast Cancer Survivors: The Thinking and Living With Cancer Study. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.22.00406