Overall Survival With Palbociclib Plus Letrozole in Advanced Breast Cancer
Open accessAbstract
Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned coprimary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical trial updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported. PALOMA-2 demonstrated statistically and clinically significant improvement in progression-free survival with palbociclib plus letrozole versus placebo plus letrozole in estrogen receptor–positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative (ER+/HER2–) advanced breast cancer (ABC). Here, we report results for the secondary end point overall survival (OS). Postmenopausal women (N = 666) with ER+/HER2– ABC without previous systemic therapy for ABC were randomly assigned 2:1 to palbociclib plus letrozole or placebo plus letrozole. After a median follow-up of 90.1 months, 405 deaths were observed and 155 patients were known to be alive. The median OS was 53.9 months (95% CI, 49.8 to 60.8) with palbociclib plus letrozole versus 51.2 months (95% CI, 43.7 to 58.9) with placebo plus letrozole (hazard ratio [HR], 0.96 [95% CI, 0.78 to 1.18]; stratified one-sided P = .34). An imbalance in the number of patients with unknown survival outcome between the treatment arms (13.3% v 21.2%, respectively) limited interpretation of OS results. With recovered survival data, the median OS was 53.8 (95% CI, 49.8 to 59.2) versus 49.8 months (95% CI, 42.3 to 56.4), respectively (HR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.76 to 1.12]; one-sided P = .21). OS was not significantly improved with palbociclib plus letrozole compared with placebo plus letrozole.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Consistent differences in outcomes (OS and IDFS) have emerged across phase III studies of CDK4/6 inhibitors.
“consistent differences in outcomes (OS and IDFS) have emerged across phase III studies of these therapies”
From Abemaciclib plus a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor as initial therapy for HR+, HER2- advanced breast cancer: final overall survival results of MONARCH 3. (2024) · cites this paper as [18]
The Results and Discussion (Safety section; page not provided) contrasts overall survival findings across CDK4/6 inhibitor trials: OS was not significantly longer in the PALOMA trials, while ribociclib had shown a statistically significant OS improvement. The paper does not report invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) differences, so it supports only the OS part of the claim. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredPalbociclib, in contrast to abemaciclib and ribociclib, has not shown a clinically meaningful or statistically significant difference in OS in the first- or second-line ABC setting or an invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) benefit in the EBC setting.
“which in contrast to abemaciclib and ribociclib, has not shown a clinically meaningful or statistically significant difference in OS in the firstor second-line ABC setting or an invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) benefit in the EBC setting.17,18,21,22”
From Abemaciclib plus a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor as initial therapy for HR+, HER2- advanced breast cancer: final overall survival results of MONARCH 3. (2024) · cites this paper as [18]
The Results and Discussion (Safety; page not available) state that OS was not significantly longer with palbociclib in PALOMA-1, PALOMA-2, or PALOMA-3, supporting the first- and second-line advanced breast cancer portion. The paper does not establish a lack of clinically meaningful OS benefit across those trials or address invasive disease-free survival in early breast cancer. It says only ribociclib had shown a statistically significant OS improvement in this setting, so it does not support the implied OS contrast with abemaciclib. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe clinical relevance of the observed median OS improvement for palbociclib is less clear.
“while the clinical relevance of the observed median OS improvement for palbociclib is less clear.”
From Abemaciclib plus a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor as initial therapy for HR+, HER2- advanced breast cancer: final overall survival results of MONARCH 3. (2024) · cites this paper as [18]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Finn, R. S., Dering, J., Conklin, D., Kalous, O., Cohen, D. J., Desai, A. J., Ginther, C., Atefi, M., Chen, I., Fowst, C., et al. (2009) · Breast Cancer Research · doi:10.1186/bcr2419 · Cited by 1,398 · see citing works
Overall Survival with Ribociclib plus Letrozole in Advanced Breast Cancer.
Hortobagyi, G. N., Stemmer, S. M., Burris, H. A., Yap, Y.-S., Sonke, G. S., Hart, L., Campone, M., Petrakova, K., Winer, E. P., Janni, W., et al. (2022) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2114663 · Cited by 791 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- [2]Beaver JA Amiri-Kordestani L Charlab R: FDA approval: Palbociclib for the treatment of postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 21: 4760- 4766, 2015 26324739
- [3]Wedam S Fashoyin-Aje L Bloomquist E: FDA approval summary: Palbociclib for male patients with metastatic breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 26: 1208- 1212, 2020 31649043
- [5]McAndrew NP Finn RS: Clinical review on the management of hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer. JCO Oncol Pract 18: 319- 327, 2022 34637323
- [6]Finn RS Martin M Rugo HS: Palbociclib and letrozole in advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med 375: 1925- 1936, 2016 27959613
- [7]Mouridsen H Gershanovich M Sun Y: Phase III study of letrozole versus tamoxifen as first-line therapy of advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women: Analysis of survival and update of efficacy from the International Letrozole Breast Cancer Group. J Clin Oncol 21: 2101- 2109, 2003 12775735
- [8]Rugo HS Finn RS Diéras V: Palbociclib plus letrozole as first-line therapy in estrogen receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer with extended follow-up. Breast Cancer Res Treat 174: 719- 729, 2019 30632023 PMC6438948
- [10]Finn RS Crown JP Lang I: The cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor palbociclib in combination with letrozole versus letrozole alone as first-line treatment of oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer (PALOMA-1/TRIO-18): A randomised phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol 16: 25- 35, 2015 25524798
- [11]Turner NC Ro J André F: Palbociclib in hormone-receptor-positive advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med 373: 209- 219, 2015 26030518
- [12]Cristofanilli M Turner NC Bondarenko I: Fulvestrant plus palbociclib versus fulvestrant plus placebo for treatment of hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer that progressed on previous endocrine therapy (PALOMA-3): Final analysis of the multicentre, double-blind, phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 17: 425- 439, 2016 26947331
- [13]Finn RS Boer K Bondarenko I: Overall survival results from the randomized phase 2 study of palbociclib in combination with letrozole versus letrozole alone for first-line treatment of ER+/HER2- advanced breast cancer (PALOMA-1, TRIO-18). Breast Cancer Res Treat 183: 419- 428, 2020 32683565 PMC7383036
- [14]Turner NC Slamon DJ Ro J: Overall survival with palbociclib and fulvestrant in advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med 379: 1926- 1936, 2018 30345905
- [16]Goetz MP Toi M Huober J: MONARCH 3: Interim overall survival (OS) results of abemaciclib plus a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) in patients (pts) with HR+, HER2- advanced breast cancer (ABC). Ann Oncol 33: S1384, 2022 (abstr LBA15) 38729566
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Goetz, M. P., Toi, M., Huober, J., Sohn, J., Trédan, O., Park, I. H., Campone, M., Chen, S.-C., Manso, L. M., Paluch-Shimon, S., et al. (2024) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2024.04.013 · Cited by 238 · see citing works
- Authors
- Slamon, D. J., Diéras, V., Rugo, H. S., Harbeck, N., Im, S.-A., Gelmon, K. A., Lipatov, O. N., Walshe, J. M., Martin, M., Chavez-MacGregor, M., Bananis, E., Gauthier, E., Lu, D. R., Kim, S., & Finn, R. S.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes Cedex, France
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- LMU Klinikum (DE)
- Seoul National University (KR)
- BC Cancer Agency (CA)
- SAHI Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary under the MoH of Russia, Ufa, Russia
- Cancer Trials Ireland (IE)
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Universidad Complutense, GEICAM, Madrid, Spain
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- Pfizer (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- Slamon, Dennis J.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2024-03-20
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 994-1000
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- PMC
- PMC10950136
- OpenAlex
- W4391091480
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 63 · 2025: 94 · 2024: 43
- FWCI
- 58.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Seoul National University Open Repository (Seoul National University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Abbott Laboratories
- Amgen
- Bristol-Myers Squibb
- Eli Lilly and Company
- Pfizer
- AstraZeneca
- Sanofi
- Gilead Sciences
- Exelixis
- Les Laboratories Pierre Fabre
- Hope Foundation
- Mylan
- Puma Biotechnology
- Seagen
- Daiichi-Sankyo
- Eisai
- Daewoong Pharmaceutical Company
- Genentech
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
- Daiichi Sankyo Europe
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › PARP inhibition in cancer therapy
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
- Keywords
- palbociclib, letrozole, advanced breast cancer, estrogen receptor-positive HER2-negative breast cancer, overall survival, CDK4/6 inhibitors, endocrine therapy, postmenopausal women
- MeSH terms
- Letrozole, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Piperazines, Pyridines, Erb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases, Receptor, ErbB-2
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review