Cited by 56Primary Care and Health OutcomesPatient-Provider Communication in HealthcareHealthcare Policy and Management

Visit Duration for Outpatient Physician Office Visits Among Patients With Cancer

Open access
Guy, Gery P., Richardson, Lisa C.·2012·Journal of Oncology Practice

Abstract

Purpose To examine the characteristics of patients with cancer and their visits to outpatient, office-based physicians; to analyze any differences between visits to oncologists and visits to other physicians; and to examine the effect of patient, practice, visit, and geographic characteristics on the length of time patients with cancer spend with physicians during office-based visits. Methods We examined a total of 2,470 patient office visits to nonfederally employed physicians from the 2006 and 2007 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. We performed descriptive analyses to examine the characteristics of patients with cancer by physician specialty. We conducted multivariate analyses using a generalized linear model to examine the relationship between visit duration and patient, practice, visit, and geographic characteristics. Results Forty-two percent of patients with cancer visited an oncologist. Females, females diagnosed with breast cancer, and individuals with advanced-stage cancer were more likely to visit an oncologist. Patients who visited oncologists were more likely to receive an anticancer drug, radiation therapy, and an increased number of diagnostic/screening services than those visiting other physicians. The mean duration of patient visits was 22.9 minutes. Higher percentages of performance-based compensation and capitation rates were associated with visits 4.4 minutes and 5.7 minutes shorter, respectively. Conclusion Higher use of performance-based payment me…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jop.2011.000493

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guy, G. P., & Richardson, L. C.
Affiliations
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Venue
Journal of Oncology Practice
Published
2012-05
Volume
8
Issue
3S
Pages
2s-8s
ISSN
  • 1554-7477 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-469X
OpenAlex
W2011494921
Cited by
56
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2
FWCI
3.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Oncology Practice (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
Keywords
cancer patients, visit duration, oncologists, performance-based pay, capitation, physician payment models, breast cancer, advanced cancer, anticancer agents, radiotherapy, diagnostic services, National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey
MeSH terms
Female, Health Services Accessibility, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Insurance, Health, Reimbursement, Male, Medical Oncology, Neoplasms, Office Visits, Outpatients, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Physicians, Practice Management, Medical, Statistics as Topic, Time Factors, United States, Multivariate Analysis, Health Care Surveys

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review