Attitudes of Patients With Cancer About Personalized Medicine and Somatic Genetic Testing
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE: Dramatic advances in genomic technology stand to revolutionize cancer care; however, little is known about patients' understanding and acceptance of personalized medicine and widespread genetic testing (GT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a formative, semi-structured interview study with a random sample of patients with lung, colorectal, and breast cancers to assess awareness of personalized medicine and GT and attitudes about somatic GT. Willingness to undergo GT was elicited through hypothetic scenarios. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients participated; 71% were women; 42% were black; median age was 59 years; and 42% had an education level ≥ college. We found that a majority of patients either were not aware of the term "personalized medicine" or defined it in unexpected ways. Although many patients identified relevant benefits of somatic testing (eg, informs treatment), many patients also expressed significant concerns (ie, psychological harm and discrimination). A majority of patients expressed a willingness to undergo somatic (predictive, 96%, prognostic, 93%) and germline (cancer risk without incidental information, 87%; cancer risk with incidental information, 81%; pharmacogenetic, 91%) testing; however, far fewer patients expressed a willingness to undergo full genome sequencing (62%). Reluctance was attributed to concerns over incidental findings, information overload, and the lack of a clear benefit. CONCLUSION: Many patients relayed misunderstandings about somatic testing and a reluctance to undergo full sequencing; oncologists must carefully consider how they present testing to patients so that concerns over discrimination and psychological harm do not hinder test uptake. More work is needed to identify effective ways to communicate complex genomic concepts to patients and research participants.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The willingness and interest to undergo precision medicine interventions and a positive attitude towards them is high among the majority of patients surveyed.
“The willingness and interest to undergo PM interventions and a positive attitude towards them is high among the majority of patients surveyed [29, 63, 65, 69, 73, 74, 77, 91–93].”
From Patients’ and professionals’ views related to ethical issues in precision medicine: a mixed research synthesis (2021) · cites this paper as [63]
Professionals and patients fear discrimination based on the results of genetic testing, particularly by insurance companies or employers.
“In addition to possible disparities in access to PM, professionals and patients fear discrimination based on the results of genetic testing [27, 79, 92, 97], particularly by insurance companies or employers [46, 51, 54, 63, 86, 94–96, 98, 115].”
From Patients’ and professionals’ views related to ethical issues in precision medicine: a mixed research synthesis (2021) · cites this paper as [63]
Professionals and patients in some studies report psychological implications from knowing or while waiting for the test results.
“Besides these adverse events, professionals and patients in some studies report psychological implications from knowing [31, 32, 46, 51, 63, 113] or while waiting for the test results [26].”
From Patients’ and professionals’ views related to ethical issues in precision medicine: a mixed research synthesis (2021) · cites this paper as [63]
Some patients also doubt the accuracy of the tests or the value of the test results to influence their fate.
“Some patients also doubt the accuracy of the tests [63, 73] or the value of the test results to influence their fate [61].”
From Patients’ and professionals’ views related to ethical issues in precision medicine: a mixed research synthesis (2021) · cites this paper as [63]
Professionals, patients and representatives from patient organizations are concerned about whether health insurance companies will cover the costs or patients can pay for them.
“For example, professionals [45, 120], patients and representatives from patient organizations are concerned about whether health insurance companies will cover the costs [51, 63, 76] or patients can pay for them [61, 95, 96].”
From Patients’ and professionals’ views related to ethical issues in precision medicine: a mixed research synthesis (2021) · cites this paper as [63]
Cites
Gefitinib or Carboplatin–Paclitaxel in Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma
Mok, T. S., Wu, Y.-L., Thongprasert, S., Yang, C.-H., Chu, D.-T., Saijo, N., Sunpaweravong, P., Han, B., Margono, B., Ichinose, Y., et al. (2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0810699 · Cited by 8,261 · see citing works
Meijers-Heijboer, H., van Geel, B., van Putten, W. L. J., Henzen-Logmans, S. C., Seynaeve, C., Menke-Pluymers, M. B. E., Bartels, C. C. M., Verhoog, L. C., van den Ouweland, A. M. W., Niermeijer, M. F., et al. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200107193450301 · Cited by 973 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Le Tourneau, C., Delord, J.-P., Gonçalves, A., Gavoille, C., Dubot, C., Isambert, N., Campone, M., Trédan, O., Massiani, M.-A., Mauborgne, C., et al. (2015) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(15)00188-6 · Cited by 1,137 · see citing works
Erdmann, A., Rehmann-Sutter, C., & Bozzaro, C. (2021) · BMC Medical Ethics · doi:10.1186/s12910-021-00682-8 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gray, S. W., Hicks-Courant, K., Lathan, C. S., Garraway, L., Park, E. R., & Weeks, J. C.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Oncology Practice
- Published
- 2012-11
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 329-335
- ISSN
- 1554-7477 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-469X
- PMC
- PMC3500475
- OpenAlex
- W2100787935
- Cited by
- 139
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10
- FWCI
- 3.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Journal of Oncology Practice (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center
- National Cancer Institute (R25CA092203)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › BRCA gene mutations in cancer
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Keywords
- personalized medicine, patient attitudes, willingness to test, lung cancer, colorectal cancer, breast cancer, germline genetic testing, pharmacogenetic testing, incidental finding, genetic discrimination, psychological harm, full genome sequencing, patient education
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Attitude to Health, Female, Genetic Testing, Humans, Male, Massachusetts, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Precision Medicine, Social Discrimination
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review