Cited by 61Healthcare Policy and ManagementEconomic and Financial Impacts of CancerHealthcare Quality and Management

Design Challenges of an Episode-Based Payment Model in Oncology: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Oncology Care Model

Open access
Kline, Ronald M., Muldoon, L. Daniel, Schumacher, Heidi K., Strawbridge, Larisa M., York, Andrew W., Mortimer, Laura K., Falb, Alison F., Cox, Katherine J. +6 more·2017·Journal of Oncology Practice

Abstract

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services developed the Oncology Care Model as an episode-based payment model to encourage participating practitioners to provide higher-quality, better-coordinated care at a lower cost to the nearly three-quarter million fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries with cancer who receive chemotherapy each year. Episode payment models can be complex. They combine into a single benchmark price all payments for services during an episode of illness, many of which may be delivered at different times by different providers in different locations. Policy and technical decisions include the definition of the episode, including its initiation, duration, and included services; the identification of beneficiaries included in the model; and beneficiary attribution to practitioners with overall responsibility for managing their care. In addition, the calculation and risk adjustment of benchmark episode prices for the bundle of services must reflect geographic cost variations and diverse patient populations, including varying disease subtypes, medical comorbidities, changes in standards of care over time, the adoption of expensive new drugs (especially in oncology), as well as diverse practice patterns. Other steps include timely monitoring and intervention as needed to avoid shifting the attribution of beneficiaries on the basis of their expected episode expenditures as well as to ensure the provision of necessary medical services and the development of a meaningful link to quality measurement and improvement through the episode-based payment methodology. The complex and diverse nature of oncology business relationships and the specific rules and requirements of Medicare payment systems for different types of providers intensify these issues. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services believes that by sharing its approach to addressing these decisions and challenges, it may facilitate greater understanding of the model within the oncology community and provide insight to others considering the development of episode-based payment models in the commercial or government sectors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jop.2016.015834

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • To develop the $160 monthly case management payment ($960 per 6-month episode), the analysts used the US Bureau of Labor Statistics wage estimates to model the costs for the additional staff and spread the costs across the average number of episodes per practice.

    “To develop the $160 monthly case management payment ($960 per 6-month episode), the analysts used the US Bureau of Labor Statistics wage estimates to model the costs for the additional staff and spread the costs across the average number of episodes per practice [48].”
  • The simulation revealed challenges of creating statistically reliable benchmarks for determining performance incentives.

    “the simulation revealed challenges of creating statistically reliable benchmarks for determining performance incentives”
  • The budget impact simulation found that Medicare could break-even on case management payments if practices reduced other service utilization costs by roughly 4%, which was deemed feasible.

    “The budget impact simulation found that Medicare could break-even on case management payments if practices reduced other service utilization costs by roughly 4%, which was deemed feasible [48].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [11]11. Institute of Medicine: Delivering High-Quality Cancer Care: Charting a New Course for a System in Crisis. Washington, DC, National Academies Press, 2013, p 2
  2. [16]16. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services: Medicare bene fi t policy manual, publication 100-02, Chapter 13. Baltimore, MD

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kline, R. M., Muldoon, L. D., Schumacher, H. K., Strawbridge, L. M., York, A. W., Mortimer, L. K., Falb, A. F., Cox, K. J., Bazell, C., Lukens, E. W., Kapp, M. C., Rajkumar, R., Bassano, A., & Conway, P. H.
Affiliations
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (US)
Venue
Journal of Oncology Practice
Published
2017-07
Volume
13
Issue
7
Pages
e632-e645
ISSN
  • 1554-7477 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-469X
OpenAlex
W2619825499
Cited by
61
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 8
FWCI
15.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Oncology Practice (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Quality and Management
Keywords
Oncology Care Model, bundled payment, Medicare, chemotherapy, risk adjustment, care coordination, quality measurement, cost variation
MeSH terms
Humans, Medical Oncology, Neoplasms, United States, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S., Fee-for-Service Plans, Models, Economic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review