Cited by 74Lung Cancer Treatments and MutationsLung Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentLung Cancer Research Studies

Impact of KRAS and TP53 Co-Mutations on Outcomes After First-Line Systemic Therapy Among Patients With STK11-Mutated Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Open access
Bange, Erin, Marmarelis, Melina E., Hwang, Wei-Ting, Yang, Yu-Xiao, Thompson, Jeffrey C., Rosenbaum, Jason, Bauml, Joshua M., Ciunci, Christine +5 more·2019·JCO Precision Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: The STK11 gene encodes a serine/threonine protein kinase that regulates cell polarity and functions as a tumor suppressor. Patients with non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and STK11 mutations often have other co-mutations. We evaluated the impact of KRAS and TP53 co-mutations on outcomes after first-line systemic therapy for patients with metastatic or recurrent NSCLC that harbors STK11 mutations. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients with metastatic NSCLC and STK11 mutations treated at the University of Pennsylvania. STK11 mutations were identified through next-generation sequencing (NGS) in tissue or plasma. Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine the relationship between STK11 co-mutations and survival outcomes. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: From February 2013 to December 2016, samples from 1,385 patients with NSCLC were analyzed by NGS; of these, 77 patients (6%) harbored an STK11 mutation (n = 56, tissue; n = 21, plasma). Of the 62 patients included, 18 had an STK11 mutation alone, 19 had STK11/ KRAS, 18 had STK11/ TP53, and seven had STK11/ KRAS/ TP53. Patients with STK11/ KRAS co-mutations had a worse median PFS (2.4 months) compared with STK11 alone (5.1 months; log-rank P = .048), STK11/ TP53 (4.3 months; log-rank P = .043), and STK11/ KRAS/ TP53 (13 months; log-rank P = .03). Patients with STK11/ KRAS co-mutation experienced shorter median OS (7.1 months) compared with STK11 alone (16.1 months; log-rank P < .001), STK11/ TP53 (28.3 months; log-rank P < .001), and STK11/ KRAS/ TP53 (22 months; log-rank P = .025). CONCLUSION: Among patients with advanced NSCLC and STK11 mutations treated with first-line systemic therapy, co-mutation with KRAS was associated with significantly worse PFS and OS. By contrast, co-mutation of STK11 with TP53 conferred a better prognosis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/po.18.00326

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • STK11 co-mutations are associated with worse survival in KRAS-mutant lung cancers.

    “STK11 co-mutations have been associated with worse survival in KRAS-mutant lung cancers [54, 55].”

    From Drugging KRAS: Current perspectives and state-of-art review (2022) · cites this paper as [54]

  • KRAS/STK11 co-mutations often have a CD8+ T-lymphocyte deficient and T-regulatory cell rich microenvironment whereas tumours with KRAS/p53 co-mutations have an inflamed tumour microenvironment rich in CD8+ T-lymphocytes.

    “KRAS/STK11 co-mutations often have a CD8 + T-lymphocyte deficient and T-regulatory cell rich microenvironment whereas tumours with KRAS/p53 co-mutations have an inflamed tumour microenvironment, rich in CD8 + T-lymphocytes [54, 56].”

    From Drugging KRAS: Current perspectives and state-of-art review (2022) · cites this paper as [54]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bange, E., Marmarelis, M. E., Hwang, W.-T., Yang, Y.-X., Thompson, J. C., Rosenbaum, J., Bauml, J. M., Ciunci, C., Alley, E. W., Cohen, R. B., Langer, C. J., Carpenter, E., & Aggarwal, C.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Venue
JCO Precision Oncology
Published
2019-12
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
1-11
ISSN
2473-4284 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2944810278
Cited by
74
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 2
FWCI
7.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JCO Precision Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (K08CA234335, T32CA009679, P30CA016520)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Lung Cancer Research Studies
Keywords
TP53 co-mutation, non-small cell lung cancer, metastatic lung cancer, first-line systemic therapy, progression-free survival, overall survival, tumor suppressor, somatic mutations, prognostic factors, liquid biopsy, circulating tumor DNA, immunotherapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review