Cited by 11Colorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesCancer Genomics and DiagnosticsGenetic factors in colorectal cancer

Clinical Validation of Plasma-Based Genotyping for RAS and BRAF V600E Mutation in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: SCRUM-Japan GOZILA Substudy

Open access
Aoki, Yu, Nakamura, Yoshiaki, Denda, Tadamichi, Ohta, Takashi, Esaki, Taito, Shiozawa, Manabu, Yamaguchi, Kensei, Yamazaki, Kentaro +21 more·2023·JCO Precision Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) genotyping on the basis of next-generation sequencing (NGS) may guide targeted therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, the validity of NGS-based ctDNA genotyping for RAS/BRAF V600E mutation assessment and the efficacy of anti-EGFR and BRAF-targeted therapies on the basis of ctDNA results remains unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The performance of NGS-based ctDNA genotyping for RAS/BRAF V600E mutation assessment was compared with that of a validated polymerase chain reaction–based tissue testing in patients with mCRC enrolled in the GOZILA study, a nationwide plasma genotyping study. The primary end points were concordance rate, sensitivity, and specificity. The efficacy of anti-EGFR and BRAF-targeted therapies on the basis of ctDNA were also evaluated. RESULTS: In 212 eligible patients, the concordance rate, sensitivity, and specificity were 92.9% (95% CI, 88.6 to 96.0), 88.7% (95% CI, 81.1 to 94.0), and 97.2% (95% CI, 92.0 to 99.4) for RAS and 96.2% (95% CI, 92.7 to 98.4), 88.0% (95% CI, 68.8 to 97.5), and 97.3% (95% CI, 93.9 to 99.1) for BRAF V600E, respectively. In patients with a ctDNA fraction of ≥1.0%, sensitivity rose to 97.5% (95% CI, 91.2 to 99.7) and 100% (95% CI, 80.5 to 100.0) for RAS and BRAF V600E mutations, respectively. In addition to a low ctDNA fraction, previous chemotherapy, lung and peritoneal metastases, and interval between dates of tissue and blood collection were associated with discordance. The progression-free survival of anti-EGFR therapy and BRAF-targeted treatment was 12.9 months (95% CI, 8.1 to 18.5) and 3.7 (95% CI, 1.3 to not evaluated) months, respectively, for matched patients with RAS/BRAF V600E results by ctDNA. CONCLUSION: ctDNA genotyping effectively detected RAS/BRAF mutations, especially with sufficient ctDNA shedding. Clinical outcomes support ctDNA genotyping for determining the use of anti-EGFR and BRAF-targeted therapies in patients with mCRC.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/po.22.00688

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In SCRUM-Japan GOZILA, 19% of patients transitioned to NeoRAS WT status, where EGFR inhibitors showed potential efficacy, achieving partial responses or stable disease for six months or more.

    “The SCRUM-Japan GOZILA study found 19% of patients transitioned to NeoRAS WT status, where EGFR inhibitors showed potential efficacy, achieving partial responses or stable disease for six months or more [53].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aoki, Y., Nakamura, Y., Denda, T., Ohta, T., Esaki, T., Shiozawa, M., Yamaguchi, K., Yamazaki, K., Sunakawa, Y., Kato, T., Okano, N., Taniguchi, H., Sato, T., Oki, E., Nishina, T., Komatsu, Y., Matsuhashi, N., Goto, M., Yasui, H., Ohtsubo, K., Moriwaki, T., Takahashi, N., Horita, Y., Boku, S., Wakabayashi, M., Ikeno, T., Mitani, R., Yuasa, M., & Yoshino, T.
Affiliations
  • Keio University (JP)
  • National Cancer Center Hospital East (JP)
  • Chiba Cancer Center (JP)
  • Kansai Rosai Hospital (JP)
  • National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center (JP)
  • Kanagawa Cancer Center (JP)
  • The Cancer Institute Hospital (JP)
  • Shizuoka Cancer Center (JP)
  • St. Marianna University School of Medicine (JP)
  • Osaka National Hospital (JP)
  • Kyorin University (JP)
  • Aichi Cancer Center (JP)
  • Osaka University Hospital (JP)
  • Kyushu University (JP)
  • Shikoku Cancer Center (JP)
  • Hokkaido University Hospital (JP)
  • Gifu University (JP)
  • Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University (JP)
  • Kobe Medical Center (JP)
  • Kanazawa University (JP)
  • University of Tsukuba Hospital (JP)
  • Saitama Cancer Center (JP)
  • Saitama International Medical Center (JP)
  • Kansai Medical University Hospital (JP)
Corresponding author
Yoshino, Takayuki
Venue
JCO Precision Oncology
Published
2023-06
Volume
7
Issue
7
Pages
e2200688-e2200688
ISSN
2473-4284 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4381487631
Cited by
11
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2
FWCI
1.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • JCO Precision Oncology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Amgen
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Pfizer
  • AstraZeneca
  • Sanofi
  • Gilead Sciences
  • Array BioPharma
  • Merck KGaA
  • Taiho Pharmaceutical
  • Nihon Medi-Physics
  • Parexel
  • BeiGene
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Japan
  • Incyte
  • Nipro
  • Kaken Pharmaceutical
  • Azərbaycan Milli Elmlər Akademiyası
  • Daiichi-Sankyo
  • Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma
  • Eisai
  • Astellas Pharma
  • Shionogi
  • Yakult Honsha
  • Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation
  • Ono Pharmaceutical
  • Chugai Pharmaceutical
  • Eli Lilly Japan
  • Bayer Yakuhin
  • Daiichi Sankyo Company
  • Daiichi Sankyo Europe
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
Keywords
metastatic colorectal cancer, circulating tumor DNA, liquid biopsy, BRAF V600E mutation, plasma genotyping, ctDNA fraction, anti-EGFR therapy, BRAF-targeted therapy, targeted therapy selection, progression-free survival, KRAS mutation, KRAS wild-type
MeSH terms
Colonic Neoplasms, Genotype, Humans, Japan, Mutation, Rectal Neoplasms, Colorectal Neoplasms, Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review