CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 3

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Quantifying the Qualified: The Use of Multicriteria Methods and Bayesian Statistics for the Development of Archaeological Predictive Models

Verhagen, Philip·2005·GIS and Archaeological Site Location Modeling
DOI 10.1201/9780203563359.ch9
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1201/9780203563359.ch9

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • More ephemeral phenomena, like burial grounds, off-site features, and lithic scatters, are underrepresented in most surveys.

    “More ephemeral phenomena, like burial grounds, off-site features, and lithic scatters, will be underrepresented in most surveys (see Zeidler 1995;Verhagen 2005;Verhagen and Borsboom 2009).”

    From Integrating Archaeological Theory and Predictive Modeling: a Live Report from the Scene (2012) · cites this paper as Verhagen 2005

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Aspinall R.J., 1992, International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 6, 105, 10.1080/02693799208901899 · DOI
  2. Beinat, E., Multiattribute Value Functions for Environmental Management, Ph.D. thesis,Research Series103, Tinbergen Institute, Amsterdam,1995.
  3. Bonham-Carter G.F., 1994, Geographic Information Systems for Geoscientists: Modelling with GIS, 13
  4. Brandt R.W., 1992, World Archaeology, 24, 268, 10.1080/00438243.1992.9980207 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Buck C.E., 1996, Bayesian Approach to Interpreting Archaeological Data
  6. Burrough P.A., 1989, Journal of Soil Science, 40, 477, 10.1111/j.1365-2389.1989.tb01290.x · DOI · Paper page
  7. Burrough P.A., 1992, Journal of Soil Science, 43, 193, 10.1111/j.1365-2389.1992.tb00129.x · DOI
  8. Dalla Bona L., Cultural Heritage Resources Predictive Modelling Project, report prepared for Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources
  9. Dalla Bona L., 2000, Practical Applications of GIS for Archaeologists: A Predictive Modeling Toolkit, Wescott, 73
  10. Davis J.C., 1986, Statistics and Data Analysis in Geology
  11. Deeben J., 1997, Archaeological Heritage Management in the Netherlands, Fifty Years State Service for Archaeological Investigations, 76
  12. Eastman, J.R., Kyem, P.A.K., Toledano, J., and Jin, W. GIS and Decision Making, Vol.4, Explorations in Geographic Information Systems Technology, United Nations Institute for Training and Research (European Office), Geneva, 1993.
  13. Finke P., 1994, Territory, Time and State: The Archaeological Development of the Gubbio Basin, Malone
  14. Iversen G.R., 1984, Bayersian Statistical Inference, 10.4135/9781412983501 · DOI
  15. Kamermans, H., Archeologie en landevaluatie in de Agro Pontino (Lazio, Italië), Ph.D. thesis,Universiteitvan Amsterdam, Amsterdam,1993.
  16. Kamermans H., 2000, Beyond the Map: Archaeology and Spatial Technologies, Lock, G., Ed., NATO Science Series, 321, 124
  17. Keeney R.L., 1976, Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs
  18. Kohler, T.A. and Parker, S.C. Predictive models for archaeological resource location in: Schiffer, M.B. Ed.: Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, 9,Academic Press, New York, 1986, pp.397-452. · DOI
  19. Kvamme, K.L., The fundamental principles and practice of predictive archaeological modeling, in Mathematics and Information Science in Archaeology: A Flexible Framework, Voorrips, A. Ed., Vol.3inStudies in Modern Archaeology, Holos-Verlag, Bonn, 1990, pp.257-294.
  20. Malczewski J., 1999, GIS and Multicriteria Decision Analysis
  21. Nance J.D., 1981, Journal of Field Archaeology, 8, 151, 10.1179/009346981791505102 · DOI
  22. Nijkamp, P., Rietveld, P., and Voogd, H. Multicriteria Evaluation in Physical Planning, Contributions to Economic Analysis 185, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1990. · DOI
  23. Orton C., 2000, CAA 96, Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, Lockyear, K., Sly, T., and Mihailescu-Bîrliba, V., Eds., 1
  24. Robertson I.G., 1999, American Antiquity, 64, 137, 10.2307/2694350 · DOI
  25. Saaty T., 1980, The Analytical Hierarchy Process
  26. Van Dalen J., 1999, Geographical Information Systems and Landscape Archaeology, Gillings, M., Mattingley, D., and van Dalen, 3, 117
  27. Van Leusen P.M., 1992, Computer Applica- tions and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology
  28. Van Leusen P.M., 1995, Archaeology and Geographical Information Systems, Lock, 27
  29. Van Leusen P.M., New Methods
  30. Venneker, R.G.W., A Distributed Hydrological Modelling Concept for Alpine Environments, Ph.D. thesis,Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, 1996.
  31. Wansleeben, M., Applications of geographical information systems in archaeological research, in Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods 1988, Rahtz, S.P.Q., Ed., BAR International Series 466(ii), Tempus Reparatum, Oxford, 1988, pp.435-451.
  32. Wansleeben M., 1997, Archaeological Dialogues, 4, 53, 10.1017/S1380203800000908 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Warren R.E., 1990, Interpreting Space: GIS and Archaeology, Allen, 90
  34. Wescott K.L., 2000, Practical Applications of GIS for Archaeologists: A Predictive Modeling Toolkit

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Verhagen, P.
Venue
GIS and Archaeological Site Location Modeling
Publisher
CRC Press
Published
2005-12-21
Pages
191-216
DOI
10.1201/9780203563359.ch9
Cited by
3
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review