The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Soil Processes and the Carbon Cycle
Abstract
The interaction of organic materials with mineral particles is a fundamental process in the surface horizons of most soils. Organo-mineral interactions not only influence the dynamics of soil organic matter (Oades, 1988; Amato and Ladd, 1992; Golchin et al., 1995a; Oades, 1995; Chenu et al., 1996), but also contribute to the formation and stabilization of soil aggregates (Tisdall and Oades, 1982; Oades, 1993). Interactions between small organic molecules and clay surfaces have been described and reviewed at length (Mortland, 1970; Theng, 1974) and interactions of organic polymers with clays are reasonably well understood (Theng, 1979; 1982). Interaction of particulate organic matter (POM) with mineral particles, however, has received less attention and the turnover, composition, and distribution of POM within the soil matrix are not well known. In classical fractionation schemes, SOM has been extracted from soils using alkaline solutions and the unextractable fraction or humin, which includes POM, has not been studied extensively. In this chapter we will focus on the interaction of POM with mineral particles and consider the role of POM in the formation of aggregates of different sizes. We present a conceptual model describing the involvement of POM and microbial metabolites derived from its decomposition in soil aggregation. The importance of biological processes associated with the decomposition of POM and the associated chemical changes will be identified and discussed with respect to their involvement in the proposed model of aggregation. The conceptual model, which is based on our previous works and selected literature results, may be applied generally to soils where organic matter is an important agent responsible for binding soil mineral particles together creating an aggregate hierarchy (Oades and Waters, 1991; Oades, 1993). In the model, we proposed the existence of three levels of aggregation (< 20 µm, 20-250 µm, and > 250 µm) in which the mechanisms of stabilization differ.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Physical factors influencing decomposition of organic materials in soil aggregates
Adu, J. K., & Oades, J. M. (1978) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0038-0717(78)90080-9 · Cited by 272
Cited by
Soil structure and management: a review
Bronick, C. J., & Lal, R. (2005) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.03.005 · Cited by 4,463
Six, J., Bossuyt, H., Degryze, S., & Denef, K. (2004) · Soil and Tillage Research · doi:10.1016/j.still.2004.03.008 · Cited by 4,410
SOM fractionation methods: Relevance to functional pools and to stabilization mechanisms
von Lützow, M., Kögel-Knabner, I., Ekschmitt, K., Flessa, H., Guggenberger, G., Matzner, E., & Marschner, B. (2007) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.03.007 · Cited by 1,590
Relationship of soil organic matter dynamics to physical protection and tillage
Balesdent, J., Chenu, C., & Balabane, M. (2000) · Soil and Tillage Research · doi:10.1016/s0167-1987(99)00107-5 · Cited by 1,288
Haynes, R. J. (2005) · Advances in Agronomy · doi:10.1016/s0065-2113(04)85005-3 · Cited by 1,010
Metadata
- Venue
- CRC Press eBooks
- Publisher
- CRC Press
- Published
- 2018-02-06
- OpenAlex
- W1784426477
- Cited by
- 657
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.77
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Soil Processes and the Carbon Cycle. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1201/9780203739273
- The paper
- Soil Processes and the Carbon Cycle. (2018). CRC Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203739273
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.