Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 312

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Understanding Practice: Video as a Medium for Reflection and Design

Suchman, Lucy A., Trigg, Randall H.·2020·Design at Work

Abstract

In exploring the design of new technologies at work, this chapter begins with the view that work is a form of situated activity. Those interested in supporting the design of modifiable artifacts do well to understand the everyday processes of modification exemplified in the complex sheet case described in this chapter. Design realism can be achieved through new methods for understanding the organization of work practice in detail. Such understandings provide a basis for involving practitioners directly in the process of reflection and design through, for example, collaborative production and review of videotapes and rapid prototyping. In every setting where the authors look at technologies in use, they start with the assumption that work practice is fundamentally social.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1201/9781003063988-5

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 312

Metadata

Authors
Suchman, L. A., & Trigg, R. H.
Venue
Design at Work
Publisher
CRC Press
Published
2020-10-28
Pages
65-89
OpenAlex
W1521830515
Cited by
312
References
0
FWCI
24.36
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Understanding Practice: Video as a Medium for Reflection and Design. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1201/9781003063988-5
The paper
Suchman, L. A., & Trigg, R. H. (2020). Understanding Practice: Video as a Medium for Reflection and Design. Design at Work. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003063988-5

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.