Cited by 1Mental Health via WritingSentiment Analysis and Opinion MiningNatural Language Processing Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Natural Language Processing for Mental Disorders: An Overview

Open access
Calixto, Iacer, Yaneva, Victoria, Cardoso, Raphael Moura·2022·Natural Language Processing in Healthcare

Abstract

least one of the keywords in our keywords list, which we discuss next.Criteria (1) and (2) above are automatic and implemented in software, i.e., one can directly download our code and run it to reproduce the output of criteria (1-2) using the same keywords we use.We now discuss each criterion in more detail. ACL Anthology (criterion 1)We use an authoritative index to search for the NLP publications to include in this survey.As stated in the ACL public website, the Association for Computational Linguistics "is the premier international scientific and professional society for people working on computational problems involving human language, a field often referred to as either computational linguistics or natural language processing (NLP)" 3 .The ACL Anthology indexes 62, 486 papers across journals, conferences, workshops and shared tasks, and is arguably the most important index for research publications in NLP. Keyword matching (criterion 2)We use exact substring match between a keyword and the title and abstract, and a paper is considered a match if a keyword is contained in either of the two.We choose keywords to identify papers dealing with mental disorders that have a high estimated burden and are the most epidemiologically prevalent (Whiteford et al., 2015).We use the keywords: "autism", "ASD" 4 , "dyslexia", "depression", "obsessive compulsive disorder", "obsessive-compulsive disorder", "OCD" 5 , "attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder", "ADHD" 6 , "schizophrenia", "down syndrome", "substance abuse", "tobacco abuse", "tabagism", "eating disorder", "anorexia", "bulimia", "mental health" and "developmental disorder". Manual validationNext, we manually validate all papers by reading their titles and abstracts and filtering out any incorrectly retrieved papers (false positives), leaving a total of 3 https://www.aclweb.org/portal/what-is-cl.Last access on February 1 st , 2021. 4 Abbreviation for Autism

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1201/9781003138013-3

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Calixto, I., Yaneva, V., & Cardoso, R. M.
Affiliations
  • New York University (US)
  • University of Wolverhampton (GB)
Venue
Natural Language Processing in Healthcare
Publisher
CRC Press
Published
2022-08-09
Pages
37-59
OpenAlex
W4297819731
Cited by
1
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • CRC Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Commission (HORIZON2020, 838188)
  • Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Goiás
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
Keywords
natural language processing, mental illness, mental health, text analysis, computational psychiatry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review