The Role of Language Prediction Models in Contractual Interpretation
Abstract
Boilerplate language tends to plague most parties’ understanding of contractual clauses. Keeping this semantic difficulty in mind, the OpenAI Foundation created Generative Pre-trained Transformer-3 (GPT-3) in order to, inter alia , simplify and personalize contracts. Essentially, GPT-3 is fed with copious bytes of information from publicly available sources to assist users in language structure and simplification. Arbel and Becher believe that “smart readers”, powered by GPT-3, can be used in mobile and computer applications to effectively read contracts and explain their content. They have shown that GPT-3 can provide succinct and personalized summaries of contractual clauses, thereby demonstrating its potential to revolutionize the understanding of contracts. This chapter will first explore this technology and its inevitable impact on the future of the legal profession, including the possibility of courts imposing a heavier burden on parties based on the underlying assumption that there is a “duty to read”. Thereafter, it will delve into the uncertainties involved with such technology, essentially relying on its impact on the readability of standard form contracts. The chapter intends to contribute to the limited literature on the impact of language prediction models on contractual interpretation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
ChatGPT could be applied to existing datasets that already contain sensitive and confidential information, creating a unique and potentially high risk of unauthorized access and misuse of that data.
“Moreover, ChatGPT could be applied to existing datasets that already contain sensitive and confidential information, creating a unique and potentially high risk of unauthorized access and misuse of that data (Katrak, 2022).”
From The Future of Artificial Intelligence in Special Education Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Katrak, 2022
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Future of Artificial Intelligence in Special Education Technology
Marino, M. T., Vasquez, E., Dieker, L., Basham, J., & Blackorby, J. (2023) · Journal of Special Education Technology · doi:10.1177/01626434231165977 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
- Authors
- Katrak, M.
- Corresponding author
- Katrak, Malcolm
- ORCID
- Katrak, Malcolm
- Venue
- Legal Analytics
- Publisher
- Chapman and Hall/CRC
- Published
- 2022-10-05
- Pages
- 47-62
- OpenAlex
- W4301372579
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 12.10
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Artificial Intelligence in Law
- Social Sciences › Law › Legal Language and Interpretation
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Digital Transformation in Law
- Keywords
- GPT-3, contract interpretation, standard form contracts, legal profession, artificial intelligence in law
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review