Sustainable Livestock Production and Poverty Alleviation
Abstract
This chapter investigates the innovative application of microalgae in monogastric animal nutrition, presenting it as a strategic measure to fulfil the United Nations&s; Sustainable Development Goal of ending poverty. Against the backdrop of escalating global population and increasing demand for meat, coupled with the imperative for sustainable livestock practices, microalgae emerge as a promising alternative to conventional feedstocks such as corn and soybean, which are frequently associated with sustainability challenges, environmental degradation, and competition between food and feed uses. Despite the potential benefits, the cultivation and processing of microalgae face environmental and economic hurdles. This chapter explores the comprehensive impacts of utilizing microalgae in animal feed, particularly its role in poverty alleviation through sustainable livestock farming in disadvantaged regions, where small-scale farming prevails and livelihoods are intrinsically linked to agricultural productivity. Additionally, the chapter will discuss technological advancements that have rendered microalgae cultivation more feasible and cost-effective. The benefits of incorporating microalgae into diets, including improved growth performance, health benefits, and meat quality in monogastric animals, will be examined. The overarching objective is to highlight the pivotal role of innovative agricultural practices in achieving sustainable development goals and mitigating poverty. Insights are provided for a diverse audience, including policymakers, researchers, and practitioners, concerning sustainable development and agriculture.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Microalgae cultivation requires minimal land and freshwater, thrives on saline and wastewater sources, and captures atmospheric CO2.
“Their cultivation requires minimal land and freshwater, thrives on saline and wastewater sources, and captures atmospheric CO2, contributing to environmental sustainability [106,107,108].”
From Microalgae Bioactives for Functional Food Innovation and Health Promotion (2025) · cites this paper as [108]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Prates, J. A. M. (2025) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app15116144 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Self-citationMicroalgae Bioactives for Functional Food Innovation and Health Promotion
Guil-Guerrero, J. L., & Prates, J. A. M. (2025) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods14122122 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Self-citationPrates, J. A. M. (2025) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods14091524 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Self-citationOyibe, O. A., & Eluu, P. E. (2015) · Journal of Education and Training · doi:10.5296/jet.v2i1.7063 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Waheed, J., Qamar, A., Zhang, J., et al. (2026) · Current Research in Food Science · doi:10.1016/j.crfs.2026.101466
- Authors
- Costa, M. M., & Prates, J. A. M.
- Venue
- Smart Technologies for Sustainable Development Goals
- Publisher
- CRC Press
- Published
- 2024-11-12
- Pages
- 109-124
- OpenAlex
- W4404278274
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 4.56
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- CRC Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
- Keywords
- microalgae, animal feed, poverty reduction, sustainable livestock production, Sustainable Development Goal 1, smallholder farming, alternative feedstocks, food competition, microalgae cultivation, growth performance, meat quality, animal health
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review