Microalgae in Sustainable Monogastric Systems
Abstract
This chapter delves into using microalgae as a promising solution for enhancing nutritional profiles and promoting environmental sustainability in monogastric livestock systems. As global demands for meat escalate, traditional feed sources such as corn and soybean are increasingly unsustainable due to their high ecological costs, including deforestation, biodiversity loss, and significant greenhouse gas emissions. Microalgae emerge as a superior alternative, offering dense nutritional benefits, including high-quality proteins, essential fatty acids, and critical micronutrients, that can significantly improve animal health and productivity. This exploration covers biotechnological and ICT technology advancements that have refined microalgae cultivation, making it possible to develop high-yield, nutrient-rich strains ideal for animal diets. The environmental benefits of integrating microalgae are profound, notably in reducing dependency on arable land, minimizing water usage, and curtailing greenhouse gas emissions. Economically, microalgae have the potential to lower feed costs and enhance farm profitability, crucial in regions reliant on imported feedstocks. However, the chapter does not shy away from the challenges facing widespread adoption, such as the high costs of production and issues with nutrient digestibility. It concludes by proposing strategic approaches to overcome these barriers, alongside policy recommendations aimed at fostering broader acceptance and use of microalgae in sustainable livestock practices.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Microalgae cultivation requires minimal land and freshwater, thrives on saline and wastewater sources, and captures atmospheric CO2.
“Their cultivation requires minimal land and freshwater, thrives on saline and wastewater sources, and captures atmospheric CO2, contributing to environmental sustainability [106,107,108].”
From Microalgae Bioactives for Functional Food Innovation and Health Promotion (2025) · cites this paper as [107]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Prates, J. A. M. (2025) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app15116144 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Self-citationMicroalgae Bioactives for Functional Food Innovation and Health Promotion
Guil-Guerrero, J. L., & Prates, J. A. M. (2025) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods14122122 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Self-citationYadav, D. K., Maletha, D., Puniya, A. K., et al. (2026) · Tropical Animal Health and Production · doi:10.1007/s11250-026-05313-1
- Authors
- Prates, J. A. M.
- Corresponding author
- Prates, José A. M.
- ORCID
- Prates, José A. M.
- Venue
- Smart Technologies for Sustainable Livestock Systems
- Publisher
- CRC Press
- Published
- 2025-02-05
- Pages
- 157-172
- OpenAlex
- W4407175108
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 18.11
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- CRC Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
- Keywords
- microalgae, monogastric livestock, animal feed, sustainable livestock production, greenhouse gas emissions, feed cost reduction, microalgae cultivation, nutrient digestibility, environmental sustainability, policy recommendations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review