The special ethics of dentistry
Abstract
This chapter considers how the issues and the wider system of dentistry have shaped dentistry&s;s distinct ethical environment. The increase in corporate groups offering dental services would seem to fit with patients becoming &s;consumers&s; of healthcare. Certainly, when the doctor–patient relationship is consumerist, it emphasises the autonomy of a patient beyond all else. Whilst enforcement of rule and regulation may not be the best way to foster the moral engagement of individual practitioners, there are also tangible economic concerns. Resources spent on regulatory compliance could be spent on patient care, and distributive justice is compromised when disproportionate attention is paid to regulatory obedience. Dentistry acts as a case study for the importance of good regulation. Regulatory costs have multiplied tenfold since the 1990s, exacerbating the problems faced by dentists in balancing patient care and business. Tight regulation that protects the individual can thus have broader implications for the quality and accessibility of care that is given to the population.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Medical and dental professions share key similarities that justify comparing them in professionalism.
“Medical and dental profession have some key similarities that justify comparing them in the field of professionalism.”
From Development and validation of scale for measuring attitudes towards e-professionalism among medical and dental students: SMePROF-S scale (2021) · cites this paper as [24]
Dentistry is more market-oriented and has created a market based on wants rather than needs.
“Dentistry is more market oriented, and coupled with different cosmetic treatment options such as bleaching, aesthetic crowns and orthodontics it has created a market based on want rather than needs [24].”
From Development and validation of scale for measuring attitudes towards e-professionalism among medical and dental students: SMePROF-S scale (2021) · cites this paper as [24]
Dentistry shares ethical foundations of medicine, such as best interest, confidentiality and respect for autonomy.
“Whilst distinct, dentistry shares many of the ethical foundations of medicine, such as the Hippocratic promise of best interest, confidentiality and respect for autonomy.”
From Development and validation of scale for measuring attitudes towards e-professionalism among medical and dental students: SMePROF-S scale (2021) · cites this paper as [24]
Cites
Assessing professionalism within dental education; the need for a definition
Zijlstra‐Shaw, S., Robinson, P. G., & Roberts, T. E. (2011) · European Journal Of Dental Education · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0579.2011.00687.x · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Marelić, M., Viskić, J., Poplašen, L. M., Relić, D., Jokić, D., & Rukavina, T. V. (2021) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-021-02879-2 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
- Authors
- Obree, D., & Trathen, A.
- ORCID
- Trathen, Andrew
- Venue
- Handbook of Primary Care Ethics
- Publisher
- CRC Press
- Published
- 2017-09-25
- Pages
- 385-392
- OpenAlex
- W2940761524
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 2.87
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- CRC Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Occupational and Professional Licensing Regulation
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Regulation
- Keywords
- dental ethics, professional regulation, consumerism in health care, physician-patient relationship, patient autonomy, regulatory compliance costs, distributive justice, quality of dental care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review