The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Standards for Privacy of Individually Identifiable Health Information
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Central challenges facing the national clinical research enterprise
Sung, N. S., Crowley, W. F., Genel, M., Salber, P., Sandy, L., Sherwood, L. M., Johnson, S. B., Catanese, V., Tilson, H., Getz, K., et al. (2003) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.289.10.1278 · Cited by 1,235
The UCONABCusage control model
Park, J., & Sandhu, R. (2004) · ACM Transactions on Information and System Security · doi:10.1145/984334.984339 · Cited by 956
Estimating the success of re-identifications in incomplete datasets using generative models
Rocher, L., Hendrickx, J. M., & de Montjoye, Y.-A. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-10933-3 · Cited by 816
St. Sauver, J. L., Grossardt, B. R., Yawn, B. P., Melton, L. J., & Rocca, W. A. (2011) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwq482 · Cited by 649
Uniqueness of medical data mining
Cios, K. J., & William Moore, G. (2002) · Artificial Intelligence in Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0933-3657(02)00049-0 · Cited by 639
Metadata
- Venue
- Best Practices
- Publisher
- Auerbach Publications
- Published
- 2001-12-20
- ISSN
- 2154-4921 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2488684359
- Cited by
- 284
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 103.69
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Standards for Privacy of Individually Identifiable Health Information. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1201/9781420000177.ch38
- The paper
- Standards for Privacy of Individually Identifiable Health Information. (2001). Best Practices. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420000177.ch38
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
