The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Design and Analysis of Cross-Over Trials
Abstract
The first edition of Design and Analysis of Cross-Over Trials quickly became the standard reference on the subject and has remained so for more than 12 years. In that time, however, the use of cross-over trials has grown rapidly, particularly in the pharmaceutical arena, and researchers have made a number of advances in both the theory and methods
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sample size of 12 per group rule of thumb for a pilot study
Julious, S. A. (2005) · Pharmaceutical Statistics · doi:10.1002/pst.185 · Cited by 3,068
CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised crossover trials
Dwan, K., Li, T., Altman, D. G., & Elbourne, D. (2019) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.l4378 · Cited by 785
Initial phase 2 trial of a nicotinic agonist in schizophrenia
Freedman, R., Olincy, A., Buchanan, R. W., Harris, J. G., Gold, J. M., Johnson, L., Allensworth, D., Guzman-Bonilla, A., Clement, B., Ball, M. P., et al. (2008) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.07071135 · Cited by 426
Experimental Designs for Identifying Causal Mechanisms
Imai, K., Tingley, D., & Yamamoto, T. (2013) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society · doi:10.1111/j.1467-985x.2012.01032.x · Cited by 408
Gurbel, P. A., Bliden, K. P., DiChiara, J., Newcomer, J., Weng, W., Neerchal, N. K., Gesheff, T., Chaganti, S. K., Etherington, A., & Tantry, U. S. (2007) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.106.675587 · Cited by 417
Metadata
- Authors
- Jones, B., & Kenward, M. G.
- Venue
- Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks
- Publisher
- Chapman and Hall/CRC
- Published
- 2003-03-12
- OpenAlex
- W2269974365
- Cited by
- 484
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.14
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Design and Analysis of Cross-Over Trials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1201/9781420036091
- The paper
- Jones, B., & Kenward, M. G. (2003). Design and Analysis of Cross-Over Trials. Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420036091
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
