The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multilevel Statistical Models
Abstract
Recent travel demand forecasting systems and related data analyses target individual and household variations in behavior not only as functions of individual and household characteristics, but also as functions of other variables to capture the effect of social and geographical context on individual and household behavior. As discussed in previous chapters new conceptual and theoretical ideas in travel behavior are increasingly offered, providing analytical frameworks for human behavior in geographic space, social space, and time. To test hypotheses within these frameworks and to capture the relationships within and across different dimensions (levels), suitable data analytic techniques are needed. Assuming we are able to identify and clearly define levels of social groupings, such as the family, the neighborhood, or the professional group, our interest centers on explaining individual behavior not only as a function of personal motivational factors, but also as a function of group influence, such as task allocation(s) and role assignments within a group (e.g., the household). At a more macro (aggregate) level we are also interested in the role personal factors play in shaping group behavior(s). Techniques to accomplish this must support behavioral theories that aim to explain behavior using factors that influence behavior at the same level of the behavioral unit of analysis (named micro-to-micro relationships), at one level higher (more aggregated) from processes taking place (named macro-to-micro effects), and at one level lower from processes taking place (named micro-to-macro effects). Data analyses that include variables from different levels (e.g., a person, household, neighborhood, city, state) are inherently operating at multiple levels. These are called multilevel analyses because they examine the relationships among variables that are defined at different and multiple levels. Figure 9.1 provides an example of a hierarchy of this type. Each observation is a time point at which a person’s behavior has been recorded or reported (within the time dimension we can have another hierarchy of Konstadinos G. Goulias Pennsylvania State University
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hsiao, C. (2014) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139839327 · Cited by 7,869
Balestra, P., & Nerlove, M. (1966) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1909771 · Cited by 1,005
Cited by
The effect of pro-environmental preferences on bond prices: Evidence from green bonds
Zerbib, O. D. (2019) · Journal of Banking & Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2018.10.012 · Cited by 1,379
Marsh, H. W., & Craven, R. G. (2006) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00010.x · Cited by 1,368
Marsh, H. W., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Köller, O., & Baumert, J. (2005) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00853.x · Cited by 1,198
A simple method for distinguishing within- versus between-subject effects using mixed models
van de Pol, M., & Wright, J. (2009) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.11.006 · Cited by 951
Academic self‐concept and academic achievement: Relations and causal ordering
Marsh, H. W., & Martin, A. J. (2011) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1348/000709910x503501 · Cited by 975
Metadata
- Authors
- Goulias, K.
- Venue
- New Directions in Civil Engineering
- Publisher
- CRC Press
- Published
- 2002-12-26
- ISSN
- 2154-7319 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2480193640
- Cited by
- 1,270
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 125.75
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.