The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Rapid Application Development
Abstract
Although the traditional waterfall SDLC is a proven method for developing systems and provides a high level of structure to the process, as noted in Section IV, there are distinct disadvantages to it, most notably the elapsed time between definition of requirements and the delivery of a system, and the lack of customer involvement throughout the process. The concept of rapid application development or RAD was one of the IT industry’s answers to these problems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
How Peripheral Developers Contribute to Open-Source Software Development
Setia, P., Rajagopalan, B., Sambamurthy, V., & Calantone, R. (2012) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1100.0311 · Cited by 110
Balán, I. C., Lopez-Rios, J., Nayak, S., Lentz, C., Arumugam, S., Kutner, B., Dolezal, C., Macar, O. U., Pabari, T., Wang Ying, A., et al. (2020) · AIDS and Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10461-019-02718-y · Cited by 53
Metadata
- Venue
- Six Sigma Software Development
- Publisher
- Auerbach Publications
- Published
- 2007-03-27
- Pages
- 341-348
- OpenAlex
- W1548702565
- Cited by
- 425
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 111.20
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rapid Application Development. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1201/9781420044287-38
- The paper
- Rapid Application Development. (2007). Six Sigma Software Development. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420044287-38
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
