Cited by 82Multisensory perception and integrationTactile and Sensory InteractionsVisual perception and processing mechanisms

Multisensory Integration Develops Late in Humans

Burr, David, Gori, Monica·2011·Frontiers in Neuroscience

Abstract

From birth, we interact with the world through our senses, which provide complementary information about the environment. To perceive and interact with a coherent world, our brain has to merge information from the different senses as efœciently as possible. Because the same environmental property may be signaled by more than one sense, the brain must integrate redundant signals of a particular property (such as the size and shape of an object held in the hand), which can result in a more precise estimate than either individual estimate. Much behavioral, electrophysiological, and neuroimaging evidence has shown that signals from the different senses related to the same event, congruent in space and time, increase the accuracy and precision of its encoding well beyond what would be possible from independent estimates from individual senses. Several recent studies have suggested that human adults integrate redundant information in a statistically optimal fashion (e.g., Alais and Burr 2004; Ernst and Banks 2002; Trommershäuser et al. in press).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1201/9781439812174-23

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burr, D., & Gori, M.
Venue
Frontiers in Neuroscience
Publisher
CRC Press
Published
2011-08-25
Pages
345-362
ISSN
2154-5723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4249680818
Cited by
82
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
14.91
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Frontiers in neuroscience (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
multisensory integration, statistical optimality, perceptual precision, cross-modal correspondence, sensorimotor integration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review