Cited by 280Multisensory perception and integrationLanguage Development and DisordersPhonetics and Phonology Research

Lip reading in infants: Attention to speech presented in- and out-of-synchrony

Dodd, Barbara·1979·Cognitive Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0010-0285(79)90021-5

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Infants are sensitive to temporal synchrony in audiovisual speech.

    “Research has also shown that infants are sensitive to temporal synchrony in audiovisual speech”

    From The McGurk effect in infants (1997) · cites this paper as Dodd, 1979

  • There is a good deal of evidence that infants are sensitive to audiovisual correspondences in speech.

    “there is a good deal ofevidence that infants are sensitive to audiovisual correspondences in speech”

    From The McGurk effect in infants (1997) · cites this paper as Dodd, 1979

  • Three- to four-month-olds attended longer to audiovisual speech that was in synchrony than to speech presented out of synchrony by 400 msec.

    “Dodd (1979) demonstrated that 3-to 4-month-olds attended longer to audiovisual speech that was in synchrony than to speech presented out of synchrony by 400 msec.”

    From The McGurk effect in infants (1997) · cites this paper as Dodd, 1979

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dodd, B.
Affiliations
Medical Research Council (GB)
Corresponding author
Dodd, Barbara
Venue
Cognitive Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1979-10
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
478-484
ISSN
0010-0285 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1963730080
Cited by
279
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 11
FWCI
3.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cognitive Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
Keywords
speech perception, lip movement, attention, speech perception development
MeSH terms
Child Behavior, Female, Humans, Infant, Lipreading, Male, Speech Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review