The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Structural health monitoring using smart sensors
Abstract
Industrialized nations have a huge investment in the pervasive civil infrastructure on which our lives rely. To properly manage this infrastructure, its condition or serviceability should be reliably assessed. For condition or serviceability assessment, Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) has been considered to provide information on the current state of structures by measuring structural vibration responses and other physical phenomena and conditions. Civil infrastructure is typically large-scale, exhibiting a wide variety of complex behavior; estimation of a structure's state is a challenging task. While SHM has been and still is intensively researched, further efforts are required to provide efficient and effective management of civil infrastructure. Smart sensors, with their on-board computational and communication capabilities, offer new opportunities for SHM. Without the need for power or communication cables, installation cost can be brought down drastically. Smart sensors will help to make monitoring of structures with a dense array of sensors economically practical. Densely installed smart sensors are expected to be rich information sources for SHM. Efforts toward realization of SHM systems using smart sensors, however, have not resulted in full-fledged applications. All efforts to date have encountered difficulties originating from limited resources on smart sensors (e.g., small memory size, small communication throughput, limited speed of the CPU, etc.). To realize an SHM system employing smart sensors, this system needs to be designed considering both the characteristics of the smart sensor and the structures to be monitored. This research addresses issues in smart sensor usages in SHM applications and realizes, for the first time, a scalable and extensible SHM system using smart sensors. The architecture of the proposed SHM is first presented. The Intel Imote2 equipped with an accelerometer sensor board is chosen as the smart sensor platform to demonstrate the efficacy of this architecture. Middleware services such as model-based data aggregation, reliable communication, and synchronized sensing are developed. SHM Algorithms identified as promising for the usage on smart sensor systems are extended to improve practicability and implemented on Imote2s. Careful attention has been paid to integrating these software components so that the system possesses identified desirable features. The damage detection capability and autonomous operation of the developed system are then experimentally verified. The SHM system consisting of ten Imote2s are installed on a scale-model truss. The SHM system monitors the truss in a distributed manner to localize simulated damage. In summary, this report proposes and realizes a scalable and autonomous SHM system using smart sensors. The system is experimentally verified to be effective for damage detection. The autonomous nature of the system is also demonstrated. Successful completion of this research paves the way toward full-scale SHM systems employing a dense array of smart sensors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An algorithm for the machine calculation of complex Fourier series
Cooley, J. W., & Tukey, J. W. (1965) · Mathematics of Computation · doi:10.1090/s0025-5718-1965-0178586-1 · Cited by 13,154
Los Alamos National Lab., N. (. S., Doebling, S., USDOE, W., Farrar, C., Prime, M., & Shevitz, D. (1996) · doi:10.2172/249299 · Cited by 2,899 · cited 5×
“As Doebling et al. (1996) describes, the objective function is numerically optimized to update the matrices under constraints such as matrix sparsity, connectivity, symmetry, and matrix positivity.”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Cited by
Jang, S., Jo, H., Cho, S., Mechitov, K., Rice, J. A., Sim, S.-H., Jung, H.-J., Yun, C.-B., Spencer, B. F. J., & Agha, G. (2010) · Smart Structures and Systems · doi:10.12989/sss.2010.6.5_6.439 · Cited by 428
Self-citationComputational methodologies for optimal sensor placement in structural health monitoring: A review
Tan, Y., & Zhang, L. (2020) · Structural Health Monitoring · doi:10.1177/1475921719877579 · Cited by 186
Structural Health Monitoring Damage Detection Systems for Aerospace
(2021) · Springer Aerospace Technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-72192-3 · Cited by 92
Yu, Y., Han, F., Bao, Y., & Ou, J. (2016) · IEEE Sensors Journal · doi:10.1109/jsen.2015.2512846 · Cited by 48
Analytical minimization of synchronicity errors in stochastic identification
Bernal, D. (2018) · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.04.043 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Nagayama, T., Spencer, B., & Rice, J.
- Venue
- World Forum on Smart Materials and Smart Structures Technology
- Publisher
- CRC Press
- Published
- 2008-07
- OpenAlex
- W1601799727
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 169.32
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Structural health monitoring using smart sensors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1201/9781439828441.ch129
- The paper
- Nagayama, T., Spencer, B., & Rice, J. (2008). Structural health monitoring using smart sensors. World Forum on Smart Materials and Smart Structures Technology. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781439828441.ch129
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.