The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Safety of Irradiated Foods
Abstract
This work examines the exaggerations, misunderstandings and muddled terminology that often characterize the controversies regarding the safety of food irradiation. It sets out to untangle the conflicting claims asserted by the proponents and opponents of this modern method of food processing. Information is drawn from international scientific and p
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Gelatin: A Valuable Protein for Food and Pharmaceutical Industries: Review
Djagny, K. B., Wang, Z., & Xu, S. (2001) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/20014091091904 · Cited by 554
Irradiation as a method for decontaminating food
Farkas, J. (1998) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s0168-1605(98)00132-9 · Cited by 543
Non-Thermal processing of tender coconut water—A review
Rajashri, K., Rastogi, N. K., & Negi, P. S. (2022) · Food Reviews International · doi:10.1080/87559129.2020.1847142 · Cited by 24
RABABAH, T., OVER, K., HETTIARACHCHY, N. S., HORAX, R., ESWARANANDAM, S., DAVIS, B., DICKSON, J., & NIEBUHR, S. (2010) · Journal of Food Processing and Preservation · doi:10.1111/j.1745-4549.2009.00381.x · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Diehl, J. F.
- Venue
- CRC Press eBooks
- Publisher
- CRC Press
- Published
- 1995-07-11
- OpenAlex
- W2033094706
- Cited by
- 573
- References
- 0
- Type
- reference entry
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Safety of Irradiated Foods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1201/9781482273168
- The paper
- Diehl, J. F. (1995). Safety of Irradiated Foods. CRC Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781482273168
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
