The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Usability Evaluation In Industry
Abstract
Part 1 Elements of usability: a combined effort the standardization of user interface usable usability evaluations - if the mountain won't come to Mohammed, Mohammed must go to the mountain combining data the evaluation of product usability. Part 2 Selecting evaluation methods: factors affecting methods and techniques of usability evaluation information ecologies, experience and ergonomics do-it-yourself usability evaluation - guiding software developers to usability. Part 3 Field studies: service information and evaluation evaluation of a multi- system situation observation as a technique for usability evaluation based prototyping. Part 4 Informal methods: quick and dirty usability tests effective informal methods getting the most out of quick and dirty user interface simulations. Part 5 New evaluation methods: a cost-effective method for the in the field usabilty evaluation co-discovery exploration - an informal method for the iterative design of consumer products private camera conversation - a new method for eliciting user responses repatory grid theory and its application to product evaluation. Part 6 Off the shelf evaluation methods: software usability measurement inventory - background and usage the usability checklist approach revisited SUS - a quick and dirty usability scale FACE - a rapid method for evaluation user interfaces. Part 7 Task analysis: hierarchical task analysis - an overview task analysis for error identification. Part 8 Issues relating to usability evaluation: performance measurement and ecological evaluation seminar discussions - issues for usability evaluation industry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
An Empirical Evaluation of the System Usability Scale
Bangor, A., Kortum, P. T., & Miller, J. T. (2008) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447310802205776 · Cited by 5,181
The System Usability Scale: Past, Present, and Future
Lewis, J. R. (2018) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2018.1455307 · Cited by 1,958
(2013) · Journal of Usability Studies archive · Cited by 1,357
The Factor Structure of the System Usability Scale
Lewis, J. R., & Sauro, J. (2009) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-02806-9_12 · Cited by 1,278
Methods to support human-centred design
MAGUIRE, M. (2001) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1006/ijhc.2001.0503 · Cited by 1,057
Metadata
- Venue
- CRC Press eBooks
- Publisher
- CRC Press
- Published
- 1996-06-11
- OpenAlex
- W591743112
- Cited by
- 4,354
- References
- 0
- Type
- reference entry
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Usability Evaluation In Industry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1201/9781498710411
- The paper
- Usability Evaluation In Industry. (1996). CRC Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781498710411
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.