The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Randomized Algorithms for Matrices and Data
Abstract
Randomized algorithms for very large matrix problems have received a great deal of attention in recent years.Much of this work was motivated by problems in large-scale data analysis, largely since matrices are popular structures with which to model data drawn from a wide range of application domains, and this work was performed by individuals from many different research communities.While the most obvious benefit of randomization is that it can lead to faster algorithms, either in worst-case asymptotic theory and/or numerical implementation, there are numerous other benefits that are at least as important.For example, the use of randomization can lead to simpler algorithms that are easier to analyze or reason about when applied in counterintuitive settings; it can lead to algorithms with more interpretable output, which is of interest in applications where analyst time rather than just computational time is of interest; it can lead implicitly to regularization and more robust output; and randomized algorithms can often be organized to exploit modern computational architectures better than classical numerical methods.This monograph will provide a detailed overview of recent work on the theory of randomized matrix algorithms as well as the application of those ideas to the solution of practical problems in large-scale data analysis.Throughout this review, an emphasis will be placed on a few simple core ideas that underlie not only recent theoretical advances but also the usefulness of these tools in large-scale data applications.Crucial in this context is the connection with the concept of statistical leverage.This concept has long been used in statistical regression diagnostics to identify outliers; and it has recently proved crucial in the development of improved worst-case matrix algorithms that are also amenable to high-quality numerical implementation and that are useful to domain scientists.This connection arises naturally when one explicitly decouples the effect of randomization in these matrix algorithms from the underlying linear algebraic structure.This decoupling also permits much finer control in the application of randomization, as well as the easier exploitation of domain knowledge.Most of the review will focus on random sampling algorithms and random projection algorithms for versions of the linear least-squares problem and the low-rank matrix approximation problem.These two problems are fundamental in theory and ubiquitous in practice.Randomized methods solve these problems by constructing and operating on a randomized sketch of the input matrix Afor random sampling methods, the sketch consists of a small number of carefully-sampled and rescaled columns/rows of A, while for random projection methods, the sketch consists of a small number of linear combinations of the columns/rows of A. Depending on the specifics of the situation, when compared with the best previously-existing deterministic algorithms, the resulting randomized algorithms have worst-case running time that is asymptotically faster; their numerical implementations are faster in terms of clock-time; or they can be implemented in parallel computing environments where existing numerical algorithms fail to run at all.Numerous examples illustrating these observations will be described in detail.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines
Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A. W., Rosenbluth, M. N., Teller, A. H., & Teller, E. (1953) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1699114 · Cited by 37,192
Golub, G. (2012) · doi:10.56021/9781421407944 · Cited by 34,505
A Global Geometric Framework for Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction
Tenenbaum, J. B., Silva, V. D., & Langford, J. C. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.290.5500.2319 · Cited by 13,585
An algorithm for the machine calculation of complex Fourier series
Cooley, J. W., & Tukey, J. W. (1965) · Mathematics of Computation · doi:10.1090/s0025-5718-1965-0178586-1 · Cited by 13,154
Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3,000 shared controls
The Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium, Management Committee, Burton, P. R., Clayton, D. G., Cardon, L. R., Craddock, N., Deloukas, P., Duncanson, A., Kwiatkowski, D. P., McCarthy, M. I., et al. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05911 · Cited by 9,442
Population Structure and Eigenanalysis
Patterson, N., Price, A. L., & Reich, D. (2006) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0020190 · Cited by 5,280
Approximate nearest neighbors: towards removing the curse of dimensionality
Indyk, P., & Motwani, R. (1998) · Proceedings of the thirtieth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing - STOC '98 · doi:10.1145/276698.276876 · Cited by 4,188
Genes mirror geography within Europe
Novembre, J., Johnson, T., Bryc, K., Kutalik, Z., Boyko, A. R., Auton, A., Indap, A., King, K. S., Bergmann, S., Nelson, M. R., et al. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07331 · Cited by 1,479
Randomized algorithms for the low-rank approximation of matrices
Liberty, E., Woolfe, F., Martinsson, P.-G., Rokhlin, V., & Tygert, M. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0709640104 · Cited by 559
Data mining and machine learning in astronomy
BALL, N. M., & BRUNNER, R. J. (2010) · International Journal of Modern Physics D · doi:10.1142/s0218271810017160 · Cited by 383
Cited by
Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects
Jordan, M. I., & Mitchell, T. M. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa8415 · Cited by 9,955
RASL: Robust Alignment by Sparse and Low-Rank Decomposition for Linearly Correlated Images
Peng, Y., Ganesh, A., Wright, J., Xu, W., & Ma, Y. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2011.282 · Cited by 817
Stochastic gradient descent, weighted sampling, and the randomized Kaczmarz algorithm
Needell, D., Srebro, N., & Ward, R. (2016) · Mathematical Programming · doi:10.1007/s10107-015-0864-7 · Cited by 432
Data-Driven Aerospace Engineering: Reframing the Industry with Machine Learning
Brunton, S. L., Nathan Kutz, J., Manohar, K., Aravkin, A. Y., Morgansen, K., Klemisch, J., Goebel, N., Buttrick, J., Poskin, J., Blom-Schieber, A. W., et al. (2021) · AIAA Journal · doi:10.2514/1.j060131 · Cited by 270
Shallow neural networks for fluid flow reconstruction with limited sensors
Erichson, N. B., Mathelin, L., Yao, Z., Brunton, S. L., Mahoney, M. W., & Kutz, J. N. (2020) · Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.2020.0097 · Cited by 259
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- MAHONEY, M.
- Venue
- Chapman & Hall/CRC Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Series
- Publisher
- Chapman and Hall/CRC
- Published
- 2012-03-29
- ISSN
- 2154-5286 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1999352252
- Cited by
- 409
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 111.61
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Randomized Algorithms for Matrices and Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1201/b11822-37
- The paper
- MAHONEY, M. (2012). Randomized Algorithms for Matrices and Data. Chapman & Hall/CRC Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Series. https://doi.org/10.1201/b11822-37
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.