Cited by 507Telomeres, Telomerase, and SenescenceGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

Telomere Length in the Newborn

Okuda, Koji, Bardeguez, Arlene, Gardner, Jeffrey P, Rodriguez, Paulette, Ganesh, Vijaya, Kimura, Masayuki, Skurnick, Joan, Awad, Girgis +1 more·2002·Pediatric Research

Abstract

Telomere length is similar in different organs of the human fetus but variable among fetuses. During extrauterine life telomere length is highly variable among individuals and longer in women than men. In the present work we addressed the following questions: 1) Are there sex-related differences in telomere length at birth? 2) Is there synchrony (i.e. correlation in length) of telomeres in tissues within the newborn? 3) Is the variability in telomere length among newborns as large as that in adults? We studied normal male and female newborns who donated DNA samples from three sources: white blood cells, umbilical artery, and foreskin. Telomere length was measured by the mean length of the terminal restriction fragments (TRF). TRF length was not different between male and female newborns. It was highly synchronized among the DNA samples from white blood cells, umbilical artery and skin within individual donors but exhibited a high variability among donors. We conclude that there is no evidence for the effect of sex on telomere length at birth, suggesting that longer telomeres in women than men arise from a slower rate of telomeric attrition in women. The variability in telomere length among newborns and synchrony in telomere length within organs of the newborn are consistent with the concept that variations in telomere length among adults are in large part attributed to determinants (genetic and environmental) that start exerting their effect in utero.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1203/00006450-200209000-00012

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 19 · Cited by 507

Authors
Okuda, K., Bardeguez, A., Gardner, J. P., Rodriguez, P., Ganesh, V., Kimura, M., Skurnick, J., Awad, G., & Aviv, A.
Affiliations
Rutgers New Jersey Medical School (US)
Corresponding author
Aviv, Abraham
Venue
Pediatric Research
Published
2002-09
Volume
52
Issue
3
Pages
377-381
ISSN
  • 0031-3998 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-0447
OpenAlex
W1979176867
Cited by
507
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 25
FWCI
4.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pediatric Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • American Heart Association
  • New Jersey Health Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
telomere length, neonates, sex differences, interindividual variability, terminal restriction fragments, leukocytes, prepuce, fetal development
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Birth Weight, DNA, Female, Gestational Age, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Leukocytes, Male, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Sex Characteristics, Statistics as Topic, Umbilical Arteries, Telomere

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review