The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Beginning with the application in mind: Designing and planning health behavior change interventions to enhance dissemination
Abstract
Failing to retain an adequate number of study participants in behavioral intervention trials poses a threat to interpretation of study results and its external validity. This qualitative investigation describes the retention strategies promoted by the recruitment and retention committee of the Behavior Change Consortium, a group of 15 university-based sites funded by the National Institutes of Health to implement studies targeted toward disease prevention through behavior change. During biannual meetings, focus groups were conducted with all sites to determine barriers encountered in retaining study participants and strategies employed to address these barriers. All of the retention strategies reported were combined into 8 thematic retention categories. Those categories perceived to be most effective for retaining study participants were summarized and consistencies noted among site populations across the life course (e.g., older adults, adults, children, and adolescents). Further, possible discrepancies between site populations of varying health statuses are discussed, and an ecological framework is proposed for use in future investigations on retention.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey.
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.57.9.705 · Cited by 7,766 · cited 1×
“Goal setting also appears to be a useful innovation ( 35 ,36) as well as including other motivational aspects in interventions (37).”
BackgroundEvaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework.
Glasgow, R. E., Vogt, T. M., & Boles, S. M. (1999) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.89.9.1322 · Cited by 7,217
Self-citationThe quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States
McGlynn, E. A., Asch, S. M., Adams, J., Keesey, J., Hicks, J., DeCristofaro, A., & Kerr, E. A. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa022615 · Cited by 5,079
Glasgow, R. E., Lichtenstein, E., & Marcus, A. C. (2003) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.93.8.1261 · Cited by 1,836
Self-citationGlasgow, R. E., Klesges, L. M., Dzewaltowski, D. A., Bull, S. S., & Estabrooks, P. (2004) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1207/s15324796abm2701_2 · Cited by 635
Self-citationOrleans, C. T. (2000) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.19.suppl1.76 · Cited by 174
A clinical trial of tailored office systems for preventive service delivery
Goodwin, M. A., Zyzanski, S. J., Zronek, S., Ruhe, M., Weyer, S. M., Konrad, N., Esola, D., & Stange, K. C. (2001) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0749-3797(01)00310-5 · Cited by 144
Cited by
RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework: Adapting to New Science and Practice With a 20-Year Review
Glasgow, R. E., Harden, S. M., Gaglio, B., Rabin, B., Smith, M. L., Porter, G. C., Ory, M. G., & Estabrooks, P. A. (2019) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2019.00064 · Cited by 2,528
Self-citationHow Can We Increase Translation of Research into Practice? Types of Evidence Needed
Glasgow, R. E., & Emmons, K. M. (2007) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.28.021406.144145 · Cited by 1,050
Self-citationThe RE-AIM framework: a systematic review of use over time
Gaglio, B., Shoup, J. A., & Glasgow, R. E. (2013) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2013.301299 · Cited by 1,029
Self-citationFeldstein, A. C., & Glasgow, R. E. (2008) · The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety · doi:10.1016/s1553-7250(08)34030-6 · Cited by 987
Self-citationGreen, L. W., & Glasgow, R. E. (2006) · Evaluation & the Health Professions · doi:10.1177/0163278705284445 · Cited by 922
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Klesges, L. M., Estabrooks, P. A., Dzewaltowski, D. A., Bull, S. S., & Glasgow, R. E.
- Venue
- Annals of Behavioral Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-04-01
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 66-75
- ISSN
- 0742-5554 (ISSN-L)
- 0883-6612
- 1532-4796
- OpenAlex
- W2137102713
- Cited by
- 324
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 12.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Beginning with the application in mind: Designing and planning health behavior change interventions to enhance dissemination. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1207/s15324796abm2902s_10
- The paper
- Klesges, L. M., Estabrooks, P. A., Dzewaltowski, D. A., Bull, S. S., & Glasgow, R. E. (2005). Beginning with the application in mind: Designing and planning health behavior change interventions to enhance dissemination. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324796abm2902s_10
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
