CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 57

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Computer-Based Assessment of Sports-Related Concussion

Schatz, Philip, Zillmer, Eric A.·2003·Applied Neuropsychology
DOI 10.1207/s15324826an1001_6
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Sports-related concussion has received considerable attention from neuropsychologists, athletic trainers, team coaches, physicians, families, and athletes. In this context, researchers have recently developed computer programs for the assessment of sports-related concussion. Computer-based assessment of sports-related concussion saves time, allows for team baseline testing, and can be easily incorporated into the sports medicine environment. This article reviews the advantages and limitations of computer-based assessment of sports-related concussion. Within a well-coordinated concussion management program that includes input from a neuropsychologist, computer-based assessment of sports-related concussion will soon be the most common approach for assessing concussion in athletes.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15324826an1001_6

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

  • An fMRI Study of Sex Differences in Regional Activation to a Verbal and a Spatial Task

    Gur, R. C., Alsop, D., Glahn, D., Petty, R., Swanson, C. L., Maldjian, J. A., Turetsky, B. I., Detre, J. A., Gee, J., & Gur, R. E. (2000) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1006/brln.2000.2325 · Cited by 352 · cited 1×

    “However, medical research efforts employing the use of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to observe brain-behavior relationships require synching between stimuli presentation and scan acquisition within very specific time intervals (Gur et al., 2000; Gur et al., 2001).”
    Background

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Barak A., 1999, Applied and Preventative Psychology, 8, 231, 10.1016/S0962-1849(05)80038-1 · DOI
  2. Barth, J. T., Alves, W. M., Ryan, T. V., Macciocchi, S. N., Rimel, R. W., Jane, J. A., etal (1989). Head Injury in sports: Neuropsychological sequelae and recovery of function. In H. S. Levin, H. M. Eisenberg, & A. L. Benton (Eds.), Mild head injury (pp. 257-275). New York: Oxford University Press.
  3. Bennett R. E., 1999, Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 18, 5, 10.1111/j.1745-3992.1999.tb00266.x · DOI
  4. Campbell K. A., 1999, Assessment, 6, 21, 10.1177/107319119900600103 · DOI
  5. 10.1136/bjsm.35.5.297 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Collins, M. (2001, November). New developments in the management of sports-related concussions. Paper presented at the 21st annual conference of the National Academy of Neuropsychology, San Francisco.
  7. 10.1001/jama.282.10.964 · DOI
  8. 10.1001/jama.282.24.2283 · DOI
  9. Echemendia, R. J. (2001, November). Return to play following sports concussion: The role of the neuropsychologist. Paper presented at the 21st annual conference of the National Academy of Neuropsychology, San Francisco, CA.
  10. 10.1023/A:1016651217141 · DOI
  11. 10.1097/00042752-200101000-00005 · DOI
  12. Elwood D. L., 1972, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 38, 9, 10.1037/h0032416 · DOI
  13. Erlanger D. M, 2001, Journal of Athletic Training, 36, 280
  14. French C. C., 1987, British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 26, 267, 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1987.tb01360.x · DOI
  15. 10.1016/S0893-133X(01)00278-0 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/0272-7358(88)90081-5 · DOI
  17. Kane, R. L. & Reeves, D. L. (1997). Computerized test batteries. In A. M. Horton Jr., D. Wedding, & J. Webster (Eds.), The neuropsychology handbook: Vol. 1. Foundations and assessment (2nd ed., pp. 423-467). New York: Springer.
  18. Lovell M. R., 1998, Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 13, 9, 10.1097/00001199-199804000-00004 · DOI
  19. 10.1136/bjsm.35.5.354 · DOI
  20. Maroon J. C., 2000, Neurosurgery, 47, 659
  21. McCrea M., 1997, Neurology, 48, 586, 10.1212/WNL.48.3.586 · DOI
  22. 10.1037//0033-2909.114.3.449 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/S0887-6177(01)00108-1 · DOI
  24. Reed A. V., 1979, Behavior Research Methods Instruments and Computers, 11, 572, 10.3758/BF03201384 · DOI
  25. Space L. G., 1981, Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 13, 595, 10.3758/BF03202072 · DOI
  26. Westall R., 1986, Behavior Research Methods Instruments and Computers, 18, 307, 10.3758/BF03204405 · DOI
  27. Westall R., 1989, Behavior Research Methods Instruments and Computers., 21, 540, 10.3758/BF03202886 · DOI
  28. Wilson, S. L. & McMillan, T. M. (1991). Microcomputers in psychometric and neuropsychological assessment. In A. Ager (Ed.), Microcomputers and clinical psychology: Issues, applications and future developments. (pp. 79-94). Chichester, England: Wiley.
  29. Zillmer E. A., 1991, Journal of Personality Assessment, 57, 381, 10.1207/s15327752jpa5702_15 · DOI
  30. Zillmer E. A., 1987, Medical Times: The Journal of Family Medicine, 115, 107

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 57

Metadata

Authors
Schatz, P., & Zillmer, E. A.
Venue
Applied Neuropsychology
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2003-03
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
42-47
ISSN
  • 0908-4282
  • 1532-4826
DOI
10.1207/s15324826an1001_6
Cited by
57
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review