CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,036Health disparities and outcomesAging and Gerontology ResearchAging, Health, and Disability

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Influences on Loneliness in Older Adults: A Meta-Analysis

Pinquart, Martin, Sorensen, Silvia·2001·Basic and Applied Social Psychology
DOI 10.1207/s15324834basp2304_2
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

A widely held stereotype associates old age with social isolation and loneliness. However, only 5% to 15% percent of older adults report frequent loneliness. In this study, we report a meta-analysis of the correlates of loneliness in late adulthood. A U-shaped association between age and loneliness is identified. Quality of social network is correlated more strongly with loneliness, compared to quantity; contacts with friends and neighbors show stronger associations with loneliness, compared to contacts with family members. Being a woman, having low socioeconomic status and low competence, and living in nursing homes were also associated with higher loneliness. Age differences in the association of social contacts and competence with loneliness are investigated as well.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15324834basp2304_2

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 45 references

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Adams R. G., 1986, Generations, 10, 40
  2. Baltes, M. M., Maas, I., Wilms, H.U. & Borchelt, M. (1996). Alltagskompetenz im alter: theoretische uberlegungen und empirische befunde [Everyday competence in old age: Theoretical considerations and empirical results]. In K. U. Mayer & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), Die Berliner Altersstudie (pp. 516-542). Berlin, Germany: Akademieverlag.
  3. Bengtson, V. L., Cutler, N. E., Mangen, D. J. & Marshall, V. W. (1985). Generations, cohorts, and relations between age groups. In R. H. Binstock & E. Shanas (Eds.), Handbook of aging and the social sciences (2nd ed., pp. 304-338). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
  4. 10.1037//0033-2909.117.3.530 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Chown, S. M. (1981). Friendship in old age. In S. Duck & R. Gilmour (Eds.), Personal relationships 2: Developing personal relationships (pp. 231-246). London: Academic.
  6. Cooper, H. & Hedges, L. V. (1994). Potentials and limitations of research synthesis. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), Handbook of research synthesis (pp. 521-529). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  7. Dawson D., 1987, Advancedata, 133, 1
  8. 10.1037//0882-7974.13.4.531 · DOI
  9. Jette, A. (1996). Disability trends and transitions. In R. Binstock & L. K. George (Eds.), Handbook of aging and the social sciences (4th ed., pp. 94-117). San Diego, CA: Academic.
  10. 10.1037//0021-9010.80.1.94 · DOI
  11. Johnson C. L., 1983, Urban Anthropology, 12, 103
  12. Kahn, R. L. (1994). Social support, content, causes and consequences. In R. P. Abeles, H. C. Gift, & M. G. Ory (Eds.), Aging and quality of life (pp. 163-184). New York: Springer.
  13. Kline, D. W. & Scialfa, C. T. (1996). Visual and auditory aging. In J. E. Birren & K. W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of psychology and aging (4th edition, pp. 181-204). San Diego, CA: Academic.
  14. Larson, R., Cskiszentmihalyi, M. & Graef, R. (1982). Time alone in daily experience: Loneliness or renewal? In L. A. Peplau & D. Perlman (Eds.), Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy (pp. 41-53). New York: Wiley.
  15. Peplau, L. A., Bikson, T. K., Rook, K. S. & Goodchilds, J. D. (1982). Being old and living alone. In L. A. Peplau & D. Perlman (Eds.), Loneliness. A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy (pp. 327-347). New York: Wiley.
  16. Peplau, L. A., Miceli, M. & Morasch, B. (1982). Loneliness and self-evaluation. In L. A. Peplau & D. Perlman (Eds.), Loneliness. A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy (pp. 135-151). New York: Wiley.
  17. Peplau, L. A. & Perlman, D. (1982). Perspectives on loneliness. In L. A. Peplau & D. Perlman (Eds.), Loneliness. A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy (pp. 1-18). New York: Wiley.
  18. Perlman D., 1978, Essence, 2, 239
  19. Riley, M. W. & Foner, N. (1968). Aging and society: Vol. 1. An inventory of research findings. New York: Sage.
  20. 10.1037//0022-3514.52.2.399 · DOI
  21. Rook, K. S. & Pietromonaco, P. (1987). Close relationships: Ties that heal or ties that bind? In W. H. Jones & D. Perlman (Eds.), Advances in personal relationships (Vol. 1, pp. 1-35). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
  22. Rosow, I. (1967). Social integration in the aged. New York: Free Press.
  23. Rubenstein, C. & Shaver, P. (1982). The experience of loneliness. In L. A. Peplau & D. Perlman (Eds.), Loneliness. A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy (pp. 206-223). New York: Wiley.
  24. Russell, D. W. (1982). The measurement of loneliness. In L. A. Peplau & D. Perlman (Eds.), Loneliness. A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy (pp. 81-104). New York: Wiley.
  25. 10.1037//0022-3514.39.1.29 · DOI
  26. 10.1037//0022-3514.57.6.1069 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Sermat V., 1978, Essence, 2, 271
  28. Wagner, M., Schutze, Y. & Lang, F. (1996). Soziale beziehungen alter menschen. In K. U. Mayer & P. Baltes (Eds.), Die berliner altersstudie (pp. 301-319). Berlin, Germany: Akademieverlag.
  29. Weiss, R. S. (1982). Issues in the study of loneliness. In L. Peplau & D. Perlman (Eds.), Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy (pp. 71-80). New York: Wiley.
  30. Young, J. E. (1982). Loneliness, depression, and cognitive therapy: Theory and applications. In L. A. Peplau & D. Perlman (Eds.), Loneliness. A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy (pp. 379-405). New York: Wiley.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 901–1,000 of 1,006

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Pinquart, M., & Sorensen, S.
ORCID
Pinquart, Martin
Venue
Basic and Applied Social Psychology
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2001-12
Volume
23
Issue
4
Pages
245-266
ISSN
  • 0197-3533 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-4834
DOI
10.1207/s15324834basp2304_2
OpenAlex
W4233280328
Cited by
1,036
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 68 · 2025: 81 · 2024: 87 · 2023: 101 · 2022: 115 · 2021: 105 · 2020: 81 · 2019: 63 · 2018: 62 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 24
FWCI
0.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Basic and Applied Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Funders
American Psychological Association
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
Keywords
loneliness, older adults, old age, social networks, social isolation, age differences, gender differences, socioeconomic status, self-efficacy, nursing home residents, family and friend contact, age stereotypes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review