Cited by 758Health disparities and outcomesAging and Gerontology ResearchAging, Health, and Disability

Age differences in loneliness from late adolescence to oldest old age

Open access
Luhmann, Maike, Hawkley, Louise C.·2016·Developmental Psychology

Abstract

Contrary to common stereotypes, loneliness is not restricted to old age but can occur at any life stage. In this study, we used data from a large, nationally representative German study (N = 16,132) to describe and explain age differences in loneliness from late adolescence to oldest old age. The age distribution of loneliness followed a complex nonlinear trajectory, with elevated loneliness levels among young adults and among the oldest old. The late-life increase in loneliness could be explained by lower income levels, higher prevalence of functional limitations, and higher proportion of singles in this age group. Consistent with an age-normative perspective, the association of income, relationship status, household size, and work status with loneliness differed between different age groups. In contrast, indicators of the quantity of social relationships (social engagement, number of friends, contact frequency) were universally associated with loneliness regardless of age. Overall, these findings show that sources of loneliness in older adults are well understood. Future research should focus on understanding the specific sources of loneliness in middle-aged adults. (PsycINFO Database Record

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/dev0000117

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • According to earlier studies, loneliness scores rise in later life and are primarily explained by the high prevalence of functional limitations.

    “According to earlier studies, loneliness scores rise in later life and are primarily explained by the high prevalence of functional limitations [20].”

    From Factors associated with loneliness in a national study among persons 80 years and older in India in 2017-2018 (2025) · cites this paper as [20]

    The Results section says loneliness is higher among the oldest old and that their higher prevalence of functional limitations partly explains this. The Discussion calls it a significant part of the late-life increase, not the primary explanation; the paper also identifies lower income and a higher proportion of single people as contributors. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Fox J, & Weisberg S (2011). An R Companion to applied regression (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Luhmann, M., & Hawkley, L. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Cologne (DE)
  • University of Chicago (US)
Venue
Developmental Psychology
Published
2016-06
Volume
52
Issue
6
Pages
943-959
ISSN
  • 0012-1649 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0599
OpenAlex
W2402676363
Cited by
758
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 83 · 2025: 98 · 2024: 105 · 2023: 93 · 2022: 114 · 2021: 110 · 2020: 73 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 3
FWCI
35.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Developmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Kölner Universitäts PublikationsServer (Universität zu Köln) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (R01AG033903, R01AG043538)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
Keywords
loneliness, age differences, life course, late adolescence, early adulthood, oldest old, income, functional limitations, relationship status, social engagement, interpersonal relationships, middle-aged adults
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Cross-Sectional Studies, Employment, Female, Germany, Health Status, Humans, Income, Interpersonal Relations, Loneliness, Male, Middle Aged, Sex Characteristics, Marital Status, Nonlinear Dynamics, Friends, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review