The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cognitive Analysis of Children's Mathematics Difficulties
Abstract
The aim of the study is to investigate the informal and formal mathematical knowledge of children suffering from "mathematics difficulty" (MD). The research involves comparisons among three groups: fourth-grade children performing poorly in mathematics but normal in intelligence; fourth-grade peers matched for intelligence but experiencing no apparent difficulties in mathematics; and a randomly selected group of third graders. These children were individually presented with a large number of tasks designed to measure key mathematical concepts and skills. The findings suggest that: (1) MD children are not seriously deficient in key informal mathematical concepts and skills; (2) MD children seem to have elementary concepts of base ten notation but experience difficulty in related enumeration skills, particularly when large numbers are involved; (3) MD children's calculational errors often result from common error strategies; (4) MD children display severe difficulty in recalling common addition facts; and (5) in the area of problem solving, MD children are capable of "insightful" solutions and can solve simple forms of word problems, but experience difficulty with complex word problems. MD children are in many respects similar to normal, younger peers; an hypothesis of "essential cognitive normality" is advanced. The only and dramatic exception occurs in the area of number facts. While clinical experience corroborates this finding, its explanation is not evident.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mathematics and Learning Disabilities
Geary, D. C. (2004) · Journal of Learning Disabilities · doi:10.1177/00222194040370010201 · Cited by 1,245
Developmental dyscalculia and basic numerical capacities: a study of 8–9-year-old students
Landerl, K., Bevan, A., & Butterworth, B. (2004) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2003.11.004 · Cited by 907
Geary, D. C., Hoard, M. K., Byrd-Craven, J., Nugent, L., & Numtee, C. (2007) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01069.x · Cited by 824
Rousselle, L., & Noël, M.-P. (2007) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2006.01.005 · Cited by 710
The Prevention, Identification, and Cognitive Determinants of Math Difficulty.
Fuchs, L. S., Compton, D. L., Fuchs, D., Paulsen, K., Bryant, J. D., & Hamlett, C. L. (2005) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.97.3.493 · Cited by 593
Metadata
- Authors
- Russell, R. L., & Ginsburg, H. P.
- Venue
- Cognition and Instruction
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1984-03
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 217-244
- ISSN
- 0737-0008 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-690X
- OpenAlex
- W2007477046
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cognitive Analysis of Children's Mathematics Difficulties. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1207/s1532690xci0102_3
- The paper
- Russell, R. L., & Ginsburg, H. P. (1984). Cognitive Analysis of Children's Mathematics Difficulties. Cognition and Instruction. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0102_3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.