The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An Integrated Model of Skill in Solving Elementary Word Problems
Abstract
Solving arithmetic word problems links the ability to execute arithmetic operations and the ability to apply these operations in real-word situations. An appropriate recent interest in word problems has produced much data on the relative difficulty of different kinds of word problems, and some data on the strategies children use to solve these problems together with the kinds of errors they make. We also have accounts of problem difficulty based on descriptions of the problem, that is, on their structural variables or on their semantic structure. We present here and account of problem difficulty based on a description of the psychological processes of the child. The purpose of this article is to outline a model of these processes, made explicit in the form of a computer-implemented model. The model solves many common word problems by acting them out with representations of physical counters. More difficult problems require augmenting this procedure first with knowledge that one object is a member of both a set and its superset, and second with knowledge that processes can be "undone" and that subsets can be exchanged. We characterize problems by the kind of knowledge the model uses to solve them. A comparison of these knowledge types with data on problem difficulty allows us to estimate how much the need to use each kind of knowledge contributes to a problem's difficulty. We also observe and relate to children's performance the sequence of steps the program produces a solution, and the errors the program makes when it lacks certain knowledge. Finally, we contrast the knowledge in the program with the knowledge we believe is acquired by children in school.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model.
Kintsch, W. (1988) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.95.2.163 · Cited by 4,363
Using Knowledge of Children's Mathematics Thinking in Classroom Teaching: An Experimental Study
Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Peterson, P. L., Chiang, C.-P., & Loef, M. (1989) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.2307/1162862 · Cited by 1,015
The Learning and Teaching of School Algebra
Kieran, C. (2006) · Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning · doi:10.1108/978-1-60752-874-620251021 · Cited by 599
Children's mathematical development: Research and practical applications.
Geary, D. C. (1994) · doi:10.1037/10163-000 · Cited by 565
The Role of Central Conceptual Structures in the Development of Children's Thought
Case, R., Okamoto, Y., Griffin, S., McKeough, A., Bleiker, C., Henderson, B., Stephenson, K. M., Siegler, R. S., & Keating, D. P. (1996) · Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development · doi:10.2307/1166077 · Cited by 485
Metadata
- Authors
- Briars, D. J., & Larkin, J. H.
- Venue
- Cognition and Instruction
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1984-06
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 245-296
- ISSN
- 0737-0008 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-690X
- OpenAlex
- W2092771413
- Cited by
- 284
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Integrated Model of Skill in Solving Elementary Word Problems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1207/s1532690xci0103_1
- The paper
- Briars, D. J., & Larkin, J. H. (1984). An Integrated Model of Skill in Solving Elementary Word Problems. Cognition and Instruction. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0103_1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.