Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 227

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Do Written Instructions Need Examples?

LeFevre, Jo-Anne, Dixon, Peter·1986·Cognition and Instruction

Abstract

An inductive reasoning task was used to compare the relative efficacy of general, written instruction information to that of more specific example information. A conflict situation was set up in which subjects were given instructions that described one procedure and an example that described another procedure. The effectiveness of example and instruction information was measured by looking at which procedure subjects used. In the six experiments reported, most of the subjects consistently used the example information and disregarded the instructions. This example effect was not the result of the order of the instruction and example information, nor was it a result of the nature of information in the instructions and example. When the instruction information was stressed as very important, the example effect was attenuated but not eliminated. The results suggest that subjects may not fully process instructions because they believe that examples are more useful and important.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s1532690xci0301_1

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 227

Metadata

Authors
LeFevre, J.-A., & Dixon, P.
Venue
Cognition and Instruction
Published
1986-03
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
1-30
ISSN
  • 0737-0008 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-690X
OpenAlex
W2089692332
Cited by
227
References
1
FWCI
3.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Do Written Instructions Need Examples? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1207/s1532690xci0301_1
The paper
LeFevre, J.-A., & Dixon, P. (1986). Do Written Instructions Need Examples? Cognition and Instruction. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0301_1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.