The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ThinkerTools: Causal Models, Conceptual Change, and Science Education
Abstract
Many cognitive and educational theorists believe that a prerequisite to learning physics is the attainment of the Piagetian developmental stage formal operational thinking. According to this view, attempts to teach children about the content and form of physical theories are doomed to failure. We argue that this is not the case. Children can learn basic physical concepts and models, given appropriately designed instruction. Furthermore, physical theories are a good domain for teaching children about the nature of scientific knowledge: its form, its evolution, and its application. This article describes an approach that enables sixth graders (i.e., 11- and 12-year-olds) to develop a conceptual model that embodies the principles underlying Newtonian mechanics, and to apply their model in making predictions, solving problems, and generating explanations. The students' learning centers around problem solving and experimentation with a series of computer microworlds (i.e., a set of interactive simulations and modeling tools that we developed called ThinkerTools). The objective is for students to construct a series of increasingly sophisticated models for reasoning about how forces affect the motion of objects. To facilitate the evolution of such conceptual models, the microworlds incorporate a variety of linked alternative representations for force and motion, and a set of game-like activities designed to focus the students' inquiry processes. As part of the pedagogical approach, students formalize what they learn into a set of laws that they examine critically, using criteria such as correctness, generality, and parsimony. They then apply these laws and representations to a variety of real-world problems. This approach integrates the learning of the subject matter with learning about the nature of scientific knowledge-what are scientific models, how do they evolve, and why are they useful? Instructional trials revealed that the ThinkerTools curriculum is equally effective for males and females and for students of different ability levels. Furthermore, sixth graders taught with this approach did better in solving a set of classic force and motion problems than did high school students taught using traditional methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vygotsky, L. S. (1964) · Bulletin of the Orton Society · doi:10.1007/bf02928399 · Cited by 20,704
The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change
Kuhn, T. S. (1977) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226217239.001.0001 · Cited by 3,861
Cognitive Apprenticeship: Teaching the Craft of Reading, Writing and Mathematics
Collins, A., Brown, J. S., Newman, S. E., & Montclair State University (1988) · Thinking: The Journal of Philosophy for Children · doi:10.5840/thinking19888129 · Cited by 1,299
Education and thinking: The role of knowledge.
Glaser, R. (1984) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.39.2.93 · Cited by 1,272
Carey, S., Evans, R., Honda, M., Jay, E., & Unger, C. (1989) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/0950069890110504 · Cited by 425
Knowing, Doing, and Teaching Multiplication
Lampert, M. (1986) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0304_1 · Cited by 329
Cited by
DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations
Ainsworth, S. (2006) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.03.001 · Cited by 1,673
Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains
De Jong, T., & Van Joolingen, W. R. (1998) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543068002179 · Cited by 1,593
Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: making science accessible to all students
White, B. Y., & Frederiksen, J. R. (1998) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1601_2 · Cited by 1,394
Self-citationStein, M. K., Engle, R. A., Smith, M. S., & Hughes, E. K. (2008) · Mathematical Thinking and Learning · doi:10.1080/10986060802229675 · Cited by 1,222
Schwartz, D. L., & Bransford, J. D. (1998) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1604_4 · Cited by 1,037
Metadata
- Authors
- White, B. Y.
- Venue
- Cognition and Instruction
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1993-03
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-100
- ISSN
- 0737-0008 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-690X
- OpenAlex
- W2028660931
- Cited by
- 492
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 121.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ThinkerTools: Causal Models, Conceptual Change, and Science Education. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1207/s1532690xci1001_1
- The paper
- White, B. Y. (1993). ThinkerTools: Causal Models, Conceptual Change, and Science Education. Cognition and Instruction. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1001_1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.