Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 492

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

ThinkerTools: Causal Models, Conceptual Change, and Science Education

White, Barbara Y.·1993·Cognition and Instruction

Abstract

Many cognitive and educational theorists believe that a prerequisite to learning physics is the attainment of the Piagetian developmental stage formal operational thinking. According to this view, attempts to teach children about the content and form of physical theories are doomed to failure. We argue that this is not the case. Children can learn basic physical concepts and models, given appropriately designed instruction. Furthermore, physical theories are a good domain for teaching children about the nature of scientific knowledge: its form, its evolution, and its application. This article describes an approach that enables sixth graders (i.e., 11- and 12-year-olds) to develop a conceptual model that embodies the principles underlying Newtonian mechanics, and to apply their model in making predictions, solving problems, and generating explanations. The students' learning centers around problem solving and experimentation with a series of computer microworlds (i.e., a set of interactive simulations and modeling tools that we developed called ThinkerTools). The objective is for students to construct a series of increasingly sophisticated models for reasoning about how forces affect the motion of objects. To facilitate the evolution of such conceptual models, the microworlds incorporate a variety of linked alternative representations for force and motion, and a set of game-like activities designed to focus the students' inquiry processes. As part of the pedagogical approach, students formalize what they learn into a set of laws that they examine critically, using criteria such as correctness, generality, and parsimony. They then apply these laws and representations to a variety of real-world problems. This approach integrates the learning of the subject matter with learning about the nature of scientific knowledge-what are scientific models, how do they evolve, and why are they useful? Instructional trials revealed that the ThinkerTools curriculum is equally effective for males and females and for students of different ability levels. Furthermore, sixth graders taught with this approach did better in solving a set of classic force and motion problems than did high school students taught using traditional methods.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s1532690xci1001_1

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 492

Metadata

Authors
White, B. Y.
Venue
Cognition and Instruction
Published
1993-03
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
1-100
ISSN
  • 0737-0008 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-690X
OpenAlex
W2028660931
Cited by
492
References
6
FWCI
121.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ThinkerTools: Causal Models, Conceptual Change, and Science Education. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1207/s1532690xci1001_1
The paper
White, B. Y. (1993). ThinkerTools: Causal Models, Conceptual Change, and Science Education. Cognition and Instruction. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1001_1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.