The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Development of Procedural and Conceptual Knowledge in Computational Estimation
Abstract
Children in Grades 4, 6, and 8 and adults estimated answers to multiplication problems. The problems varied in the number of digits: 1 x 2 (e.g., 8 x 18), 1 X 3 (e.g., 5 x 144), 2 x 2 (e.g., 22 x 91), and 2 x 3 (e.g., 45 x 164). Few children in Grade 4 could estimate. Most sixth and eighth graders provided reasonable estimates, however, even on difficult (e.g., 2 x 3) problems. Estimation performance improved with age, with adults producing more accurate estimates than children, but the most striking developmental changes were in the conceptual knowledge used to perform this estimation task. From Grade 6, students seemed to understand the role of the simplification principle in estimation. Children reduced complex problems through rounding and prior compensation to produce reasonable estimates. Only adults seemed to have a good grasp of the principle of proximity, however, understanding that it is important for the estimate to be reasonably close to the actual answer. Adults produced exact-answer solutions on simple problems and adjusted their preliminary estimates closer to the actual answer postcompensation). We propose a process model of estimation based on Siegler's model of strategy choice in simple arithmetic.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics and Culture in Everyday Life
Lave, J. (1988) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609268 · Cited by 5,148
Cited by
The relationships among working memory, math anxiety, and performance
Ashcraft, M. H., & Kirk, E. P. (2001) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.130.2.224 · Cited by 1,445
Development of Numerical Estimation in Young Children
Siegler, R. S., & Booth, J. L. (2004) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00684.x · Cited by 1,011
Billett, S. (2000) · Journal of Workplace Learning · doi:10.1108/13665620010353351 · Cited by 271
Heirdsfield, A. M., & Cooper, T. J. (2004) · The Journal of Mathematical Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jmathb.2004.09.005 · Cited by 78
Metadata
- Authors
- LeFevre, J.-A., Greenham, S. L., & Waheed, N.
- Venue
- Cognition and Instruction
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1993-10
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 95-132
- ISSN
- 0737-0008 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-690X
- OpenAlex
- W2060266223
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Development of Procedural and Conceptual Knowledge in Computational Estimation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1207/s1532690xci1102_1
- The paper
- LeFevre, J.-A., Greenham, S. L., & Waheed, N. (1993). The Development of Procedural and Conceptual Knowledge in Computational Estimation. Cognition and Instruction. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1102_1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.