The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Guided learning at work
Abstract
Reports and discusses the findings of an investigation that examined the efficacy of guided learning in the workplace. The investigation comprised the trialing of guided learning strategies and an analysis of the learning occurring in five workplaces over a period of six months. The guided learning strategies selected for investigation were questioning dialogues, the use of diagrams and analogies within an approach to workplace learning emphasising modelling and coaching. Throughout the investigation, critical incident interviews were conducted to identify the contributions to learning that had occurred during these periods, including those provided by the guided learning. As anticipated, it was found that participation in everyday work activities (the learning curriculum) was most valued and reported as making effective contributions to learning in the workplace. However, there was also correlation between reports of the frequency of guided learning interactions and their efficacy in resolving novel workplace tasks, and therefore learning. It is postulated that some of these learning outcomes could not have been secured by everyday participation in the workplace alone. Further, factors associated with the readiness of enterprise and those within it were identified as influencing the likely effectiveness of guided learning at work.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1978) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 53,488
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation.
Bloch, M., Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1994) · Man · doi:10.2307/2804509 · Cited by 39,454
(1999) · Cited by 28,356
Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity
Wenger, E. (1998) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511803932 · Cited by 23,500
Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data
Venkatesan, M., Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1986) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151491 · Cited by 4,347
Cognitive Apprenticeship: Teaching the Crafts of Reading, Writing, and Mathematics
Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (2018) · Knowing, Learning, and Instruction · doi:10.4324/9781315044408-14 · Cited by 3,674
In The Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power.
Sirianni, C., & Zuboff, S. (1989) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2073307 · Cited by 3,257
(2014) · doi:10.4324/9781315799681 · Cited by 2,174
Rogoff, B. (1995) · Sociocultural Studies of Mind · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174299.008 · Cited by 1,990
In the Age of the Smart Machine
Zuboff, S. (1988) · Cited by 1,516
Cited by
Learning through work: workplace affordances and individual engagement
Billett, S. (2001) · Journal of Workplace Learning · doi:10.1108/eum0000000005548 · Cited by 831
Self-citationWorkplace participatory practices: Conceptualising workplaces as learning environments
Billett, S. (2004) · Journal of Workplace Learning · doi:10.1108/13665620410550295 · Cited by 765
Self-citationFormal and informal learning in the workplace: a research review
Manuti, A., Pastore, S., Scardigno, A. F., Giancaspro, M. L., & Morciano, D. (2015) · International Journal of Training and Development · doi:10.1111/ijtd.12044 · Cited by 489
Toward a Workplace Pedagogy: Guidance, Participation, and Engagement
Billett, S. (2002) · Adult Education Quarterly · doi:10.1177/074171302237202 · Cited by 416
Self-citationInformality and formality in learning: a report for the Learning and Skills Research Centre
Malcolm, J. (2003) · Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) · doi:10.13140/rg.2.1.1297.3924 · Cited by 318
Metadata
- Authors
- Billett, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Workplace Learning
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2000-11-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 272-285
- ISSN
- 1366-5626 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1983132991
- Cited by
- 271
- References
- 33
- FWCI
- 18.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Guided learning at work. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/13665620010353351
- The paper
- Billett, S. (2000). Guided learning at work. Journal of Workplace Learning. https://doi.org/10.1108/13665620010353351
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.