The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Creativity: Asset or Burden in the Classroom?
Abstract
Two studies were conducted to examine teachers' perceptions of creative students. Study 1 was based on earlier works that identified personality characteristics associated with creativity. The prototypicality of these characteristics as they applied to creative children was rated by college students. Elementary school teachers were then asked to rate their favorite and least favorite students based on these characteristics, There was a significant difference between the teachers' judgments of their favorite and least favorite students on these measures. Judgments for the favorite student were negatively correlated with creativity; judgments for the least favorite student were positively correlated with creativity. Students displaying creative characteristics appear to be unappealing to teachers. Study 2 explored the conflict between the results of Study 1 and teachers' self-reports that they enjoy working with creative children. Teachers' concepts of creativity were different from concepts that have guided previous research. In a reanalysis of data from Study 1 employing the teacher-generated creativity prototype, there was a tendency (though nonsignificant) for the favorite students to be more similar to the creative prototype than the least favorite students. Areas of divergence in concepts of creativity and the implications for the promotion of creativity in education are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Brophy, J. E., & Good, T. L. (1970) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0029908 · Cited by 922
Cited by
Beyond Big and Little: The Four C Model of Creativity
Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0013688 · Cited by 2,669
Plucker, J. A., Beghetto, R. A., & Dow, G. T. (2004) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3902_1 · Cited by 1,794
The Bias Against Creativity: Why People Desire but Reject Creative Ideas
Mueller, J. S., Melwani, S., & Goncalo, J. A. (2012) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797611421018 · Cited by 658
Handbook of Positive Psychology in Schools
(2014) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203106525 · Cited by 654
Creativity and academic achievement: A meta-analysis
Gajda, A., Karwowski, M., & Beghetto, R. A. (2017) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000133 · Cited by 515
Metadata
- Authors
- Westby, E. L., & Dawson, V. L.
- Venue
- Creativity Research Journal
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1995-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-10
- ISSN
- 1040-0419 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-6934
- OpenAlex
- W2072965634
- Cited by
- 367
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Creativity: Asset or Burden in the Classroom? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1207/s15326934crj0801_1
- The paper
- Westby, E. L., & Dawson, V. L. (1995). Creativity: Asset or Burden in the Classroom? Creativity Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj0801_1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.