The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessing and Accessing Creativity: An Integrative Review of Theory, Research, and Development
Open accessAbstract
Creative thinking is a complex cognitive activity. Modern conceptions of creativity are so diverse and extensive that a definition of creativity must include related cognitive activities such as decision making, critical thinking, and metacognition. A comprehensive assessment requires multiple measures of the cognitive processes, motivations, interests, attitudes, and styles associated with creativity; the result of the creative process such as products, presentations, and performances; and the effects of environmental press factors. Creative thinking and creative problem solving are aspects of human cognition and behavior that can be accessed through a number of strategies often incorporated in training programs. These programs focus on one or more of the following: personality factors, motivation, cognition styles, metacognitive skills, and the manipulation of environmental conditions that encourage flexibility and openness for stimulating creative processes and behaviors. This article reviews theories, models, and research on creative behavior and then explores connections with assessment issues. It offers a synthesis of the basic constructs related to creative production.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Guilford, J. P. (1950) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/h0063487 · Cited by 3,588
Education and thinking: The role of knowledge.
Glaser, R. (1984) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.39.2.93 · Cited by 1,272
Cited by
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1996) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.51.7.677 · Cited by 874
Rewriting the Language of Creativity: The Five A's Framework
Glăveanu, V. P. (2013) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0029528 · Cited by 660
Fasko, D. (2001) · Creativity Research Journal · doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1334_09 · Cited by 445
Treffinger, D. J., Selby, E. C., & Isaksen, S. G. (2008) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2007.11.007 · Cited by 180
Metadata
- Authors
- Feldhusen, J., & Goh, B. E.
- Venue
- Creativity Research Journal
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1995-07-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 231-247
- ISSN
- 1040-0419 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1985378950
- Cited by
- 296
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessing and Accessing Creativity: An Integrative Review of Theory, Research, and Development. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1207/s15326934crj0803_3
- The paper
- Feldhusen, J., & Goh, B. E. (1995). Assessing and Accessing Creativity: An Integrative Review of Theory, Research, and Development. Creativity Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj0803_3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.