The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modeling the Creative Process: A Grounded Theory Analysis of Creativity in the Domain of Art Making
Abstract
: In recent years a number of researchers have attempted to model the cognitive, affective, behavioral, and contextual factors associated with the making of a work of art. However, very few studies have actually focused on understanding and describing what artists actually do during the creation of an artwork. Therefore, in this study grounded theory was used to investigate this phenomenon and to develop a descriptive model of the art-making process. In Study 1, 16 professional visual artists were interviewed over the course of making a work of art, which provided a descriptive database of their working processes from the inception to the completion of the artwork. Grounded theory was used to analyze the data and to develop a dynamic, descriptive model of the art-making process. A second study involving 9 artists was undertaken to determine the validity of this model. The results suggested that the model has adequate content validity and sufficient scope to accommodate the working processes of a range of artists.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.3.231 · Cited by 11,317 · cited 1×
“It has been argued that individuals do not truly introspect when reporting on their cognitive processes, but instead report on their implicit theories about the cause-and-effect relations of the phenomenon (Glass & Arnkoff, 1997; Nisbett & Wilson, 1977; Rennie, Phillips, & Quartaro, 1988).”
Background
Cited by
Rewriting the Language of Creativity: The Five A's Framework
Glăveanu, V. P. (2013) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0029528 · Cited by 660
Creativity as a Sociocultural Act
Glăveanu, V. P. (2015) · The Journal of Creative Behavior · doi:10.1002/jocb.94 · Cited by 368
Kozbelt, A., Beghetto, R. A., & Runco, M. A. (2010) · The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511763205.004 · Cited by 363
A MODEL OF ‘CREATIVE EXPERIENCE’ IN CREATIVE TOURISM
Tan, S.-K., Kung, S.-F., & Luh, D.-B. (2013) · Annals of Tourism Research · doi:10.1016/j.annals.2012.12.002 · Cited by 288
Artificial Intelligence & Creativity: A Manifesto for Collaboration
Vinchon, F., Lubart, T., Bartolotta, S., Gironnay, V., Botella, M., Bourgeois-Bougrine, S., Burkhardt, J., Bonnardel, N., Corazza, G. E., Glăveanu, V., et al. (2023) · The Journal of Creative Behavior · doi:10.1002/jocb.597 · Cited by 273
Metadata
- Authors
- Mace, M.-A., & Ward, T.
- Venue
- Creativity Research Journal
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2002-04
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 179-192
- ISSN
- 1040-0419 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-6934
- OpenAlex
- W2049090478
- Cited by
- 229
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modeling the Creative Process: A Grounded Theory Analysis of Creativity in the Domain of Art Making. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1207/s15326934crj1402_5
- The paper
- Mace, M.-A., & Ward, T. (2002). Modeling the Creative Process: A Grounded Theory Analysis of Creativity in the Domain of Art Making. Creativity Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1402_5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
